PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15124988

Noise in flat-panel displays with subpixel structure.

Abstract

Subpixel structures found in medical monochrome active-matrix liquid crystal displays (AMLCDs) affect noise estimates measured with conventional methods. In this work, we discuss methods that identify sources of noise and permit the comparison of luminance noise estimates across technologies independent of pixel design and device technology. We used a three-million pixel AMLCD with a pixel structure consisting of three color stripes, each in a two-domain, in-plane switching mode. Images of uniform fields displayed on the AMLCD were acquired using a low-noise, high-resolution CCD camera. The camera noise and flat-field response were characterized using a uniform light source constructed for this purpose. We show results in terms of spatial luminance noise and noise power spectrum for high-resolution images and for the same images processed with a pixel-aligned aperture. We find that the pixel-aligned aperture eliminates almost all the noise found in the high-resolution images, suggesting that most of the luminance noise in AMLCDs comes from the subpixel structure and less-than-100% aperture ratio, rather than from interpixel variations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aldo Badano, Robert M Gagne, Robert J Jennings, Sarah E Drilling, Benjamin R Imhoff, Edward Muka. 2004. Noise in flat-panel displays with subpixel structure.. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1656529

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations.

The performance of 14 primary clinical display monitor workstations in use in the Radiology Department of a large acute NHS Trust was assessed using the methods and guidelines described by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 18. Tests undertaken included the measurement of ambient light, display uniformity, luminance ratio, luminance response, maximum luminance and spatial resolution. Four display monitors failed to meet at least one of the test's guideline tolerances. In addition a number of display monitors were found to be operating at settings that might reduce their useful life span. These devices were either replaced or recalibrated by the installers, or were subject to local adjustment to ensure applicable standards were met. Consequently the study suggests that quality assurance testing of display monitors used for image reporting is necessary and valuable to ensure that images are viewed at an appropriate standard.

Computer Terminals↗