PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1513029

[Studies on the efficient application by STKS and 8200].

Abstract

We examined the usefulness of differential leukocyte counts provided by the automated STKS (Coulter) using the VCS method, the cell analyzer 8200 (Hitachi) using the image analysing as compared with that of the traditional manual method. In the STKS, about 8000 leukocytes can be counted within one minute and 5 part differential counts (neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, lymphocytes) are provided. The STKS may provided adequate identification of patients who have significant leukocyte abnormalities that require further study. Potential deficiencies of this system included an inability to detect abnormal lymphocytes such as ATL cells. In addition, low numbers of erythroblasts were missed, although these cells could be warned by a flagging system. In the cell analyzer 8200, the differential leukocyte count is done by the microscopic examination of stained blood films which is prepared by automatic device. Results from counts performed with this system correlated well with those obtained by the manual method. This system also missed low numbers of erythroblasts and ATL cells. Another potential deficiencies of the system is that number of cells observed within one minute were limited to about 100. When a prescribed set of cut-off limits, carefully chosen qualitatively, is introduced into these systems, automated leukocyte differential counts, with combination of STKS, 8200 and the manual method, clearly improve turn around time for laboratory blood assessments and this help to reduce unnecessary differential leukocyte counts by the manual method.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Mishima, T Unshima, Y Yoshida, J Endo. 1992. [Studies on the efficient application by STKS and 8200].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1513029/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Complex adaptive systems: a response to Luchins.

Luchins (2003, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 31(2), 183-186) distinguishes the mutual strengths and shortcomings of qualitative and quantitative approaches as applied to the complexities of evaluation psychiatric hospital functioning in particular, and behavioral healthcare practice in general. This brief response offers an examination of the complex interplay of factors within non-linear models in a conceptualization of complex adaptive systems for understanding causal factors in mental health administration as well as calling into question the myth of the relationship between measurement and hence control and understanding and prediction.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

In search of a familial cancer risk assessment tool.

Approximately one in three individuals will be affected by cancer in their lifetime in the United States, and some are at elevated risk because of family history. Although assessment of family history of cancer and cancer risk is the standard of care, the current health-care system appears unable to meet this need. Because individuals are increasingly using the Internet, web-based cancer risk assessment tools (CRATs) may provide a way to meet this need. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the types of familial CRATs available on the Internet and their nature. The current review evaluated five CRATs identified through an Internet search based on (i) their ability to identify those at the highest risk of cancer (i.e. those with hereditary cancer syndromes), (ii) their strengths and limitations based on criteria adapted from Rich and colleagues (2004, 2005), (iii) their readability based on four readability calculations, and (iv) their quality based on criteria from Health on the Net. The general limitations of CRATs as a whole were also delineated, including concerns about availability to those who are poor and underserved and those who have lower levels of literacy. Recommendations for future tools include assessing risk for a greater number of diseases, using theoretically driven approaches to increase the likelihood that individuals will engage in appropriate health behaviors, and making a greater effort to reach diverse populations.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research.

The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the development of metasynthesis through an analysis of the challenges involved. The study grew out of the critique of qualitative metaresearch raised by current developers of metamethodologies. Different views on the application of methodologies have emerged in the literature, contributing to confusion and ambiguity concerning the challenging questions of what, why, how, and who in metasynthesis research, which might increase the risk of misunderstanding. The roots of metasynthesis research are seen as multifaceted and influencing the development of the methods in different directions. The primary worth of metasynthesis is theoretical and/or methodological development (synthesis) combined with the potential for reflection: going beyond and behind the studies (meta). Metasynthesis research has also the potential to raise questions of research collaboration, culture, and language.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗