PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15183710

Computer aided reduction and imaging.

Abstract

Reduction is one of the key procedures in orthopedic trauma surgery and has been acknowledged as one of the conditions for a good outcome in intraarticular and extra-articular fractures. The information available to the surgeon during the reduction maneuver can be divided into visual and tactile information. The optimal implementation of these parameters, combined with the surgeon's individual experience, will significantly affect the results of the operation. Anatomical regions where a limited direct view through the approach is supported by intraoperative imaging are intra-articular fractures of the elbow, forearm, acetabulum, proximal tibia, pilon, and hindfoot, and extra-articular fractures of the spine, pelvis, femur, and tibial shaft. Surgery in these regions is demanding since the approaches limit the visual control of the axes and also the anatomical reduction within the joint. Computer aided orthopedic surgery (CAOS) was introduced to increase the accuracy of selected procedures in orthopedic surgery. One of the most frequently applied applications is pedicle screw insertion in posterior spinal surgery. The current working group has identified computer aided reduction and implant positioning as an unresolved area of CAOS that would be highly relevant to the operative treatment of fractures. The development of tools for computer aided reduction is of major importance and is much desired by the orthopedic community. Such a reduction tool would be a significant step forward in the development of orthopedic trauma care. It would facilitate new procedures and new operations and also help to attain a completely new level with regard to what we can achieve in terms of minimal invasiveness and increased precision. The synergies of the expert group are deployed to develop the required software modules and hardware. Other areas of computer aided orthopedic surgery will certainly benefit from the integration of this technology as well.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Schmucki, Florian Gebhard, Paul A Grützner, Tobias Hüfner, Frank Langlotz, Guoyan Zheng. 2004. Computer aided reduction and imaging.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Experimental validation of noninvasive referencing in navigated procedures on long bones.

Navigation procedures in orthopedic surgery require fixation of reference markers to the anatomic region of interest. Inadequate fixation might lead to micromotion or loosening of the reference marker, consequently causing registration failures or errors in navigation. Osseous rigid fixation is usually achieved by minimally invasive Schanz screws or pins. The goal of this study was to evaluate a non invasive external fixation device, a headband so far used in cranial navigation, as an alternative invasive fixation technique to reference markers in the femur. A common navigation system with an adapted trauma software application was used to track the positions of the soft tissue-attached headband relative to an invasive reference marker on the femur during manipulations of the thigh. Relative translative and rotational movements of the headband were measured during defined movements of the hip and knee and manipulations of the headband itself. The results revealed high translative and rotational movements, up to 6 mm and 3 degrees , respectively, due to minor manipulations of the affected lower extremity. Noninvasive soft tissue fixation with a headband does not allow rigid fixation for accurate navigated registration or operative procedures at the femur. Necessary intraoperative movements or manipulations would cause substantial registration failures. Invasive fixation techniques with screws or pins are still the method of choice.

Bone Screws↗

Safety of computer-assisted surgery for cannulated hip screws.

Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery has developed considerably during the past few years. Several manufacturers produce hardware and software for use in trauma surgery. Validation of these systems before clinical application is mandatory to be sure they work accurately and safely. The accuracy of surgical performance is highly correlated with the cut-out percentages of hip screws. In a standardized operative setting, three cannulated hip screws were inserted in each of 20 sawbones. The screws were positioned either by fluoroscopic navigation technique or by conventional operative technique depending on randomization. Our primary aim was to assess whether computer-navigated screw fixation is equally safe compared with conventional screw fixation using fluoroscopy. To determine safety, we investigated number of drilling attempts, screw position, and radiation time. Secondary to these safety parameters, we also compared the operating time between the two procedures to assess the efficiency of computer navigation. Statistical analysis showed no differences regarding accuracy of screw position. Computer-assisted surgery resulted in fewer drilling attempts and less radiation time, with a similar operation time. We believe the currently used navigation system is safe and accurate.

Bone Screws↗

Numerical simulation of in vivo intraosseous torsional failure of a hollow-screw oral implant.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the complexity and magnitude of functional forces transferred to the bone-implant interface, the mechanical strength of the interface is of great importance. The purpose of this study was to determine the intraosseous torsional shear strength of an osseointegrated oral implant using 3-D finite element (FE) stress analysis implemented by in vivo failure torque data of an implant. METHODS: A Ø 3.5 mm x 12 mm ITI hollow screw dental implant in a patient was subjected to torque failure test using a custom-made strain-gauged manual torque wrench connected to a data acquisition system. The 3-D FE model of the implant and peri-implant circumstances was constructed. The in vivo strain data was converted to torque units (N x cm) to involve in loading definition of FE analysis. Upon processing of the FE analysis, the shear stress of peri-implant bone was evaluated to assume torsional shear stress strength of the bone-implant interface. RESULTS: The in vivo torque failure test yielded 5952 microstrains at custom-made manual torque wrench level and conversion of the strain data resulted in 750 N.cm. FE revealed that highest shear stress value in the trabecular bone, 121 MPa, was located at the first intimate contact with implant. Trabecular bone in contact with external surface of hollow implant body participated shear stress distribution, but not the bone resting inside of the hollow. CONCLUSION: The torsional strength of hollow-screw implants is basically provided by the marginal bone and the hollow part has negligible effect on interfacial shear strength.

Bone Screws↗