PubMed · 15212229
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Thomas A Neef. 2004. Above all, do no harm.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15212229/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The psychological consequences of induced abortion are complex and subject to both considerable controversy and methodological criticisms. While many women report feelings of relief immediately after the procedure, others report feelings of anxiety, which they attribute to their abortions. The purpose of the present study was to examine risk of generalized anxiety following unintended pregnancies ending in abortion or childbirth using a large representative sample of American women. Among all women, those who aborted were found to have significantly higher rates of subsequent generalized anxiety when controlling for race and age at interview. Implications of the findings are discussed. In particular, findings highlight the clinical relevance of exploring reproductive history in therapeutic efforts to assist women seeking relief from anxiety.
Unintended pregnancy has conventionally been defined as a pregnancy that is mistimed or unwanted, and this classification has been widely used in survey research. This study explores the utility of these constructs for women who visited a family planning clinic and a prenatal clinic in inner-city New Orleans, LA, and, by extension, for women of similar background and experience. We used semi-structured, open-ended research to explore sexual debut and history, contraceptive knowledge and use, pregnancy history, partner relations, and service use among 77 women (73 of whom were African-American). This study addresses the apparent paradox of high-risk sexual and contraceptive behavior in the presence of expressed preferences to postpone childbearing. It provides some insight into the cultural and social context in which these events and decisions take place and explores the multiple dimensions that shape women's sexual behaviors and their desires for pregnancy. The dimensions explored include perceptions of and experiences with sex/sexuality, values concerning childbearing/motherhood, relationships with partners, experiences with contraception, and attitudes toward abortion. The apparent ambivalence seen in reports of women asked whether a pregnancy was intended, such as statements that they did not want to get pregnant but were either not using contraception or using it irregularly, calls into question the idea that intendedness can be routinely and easily inferred from survey research. Correspondingly, it is not possible to simply assume that either intentionality or future intentions directly affect decisions to use contraception. The problem is that the many factors-structural and individual-affect women's preferences and ability to postpone a pregnancy or to use contraception.
OBJECTIVE: To devise a score allowing a better measure of the role of social vulnerability (SV) in a woman's attitude toward abortion. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive sampling and semi-structured personal interviewing of 2641 women requesting legal termination of pregnancy from 1994 to 2001 in the county of Roanne, France. RESULTS: SV was estimated from each woman's situation with reference to work, family composition, marital status, health insurance status and characteristics of neighbourhood of residence. It was correlated with the income and home ownership situation. With a high SV level taken as reference, the relative risks (RR) of severe, moderate, and low SVP, respectively, were equal to 3.3 (1.8-6.1), 4.6 (2.5-8.6) and 7.2 (3.9-13.1) in women under 18.5 years of age; 1.2 (1.0-1.5), 2 (1.4-2.8), and 2.1 (1.4-3.2) from 18.5 to 19 years of age; 0.7 (0.6-0.8), 0.6 (0.5-0.8) and 0.4 (0.3-0.5) in those aged 19-28; and 0.9 (0.9-1), 0.7 (0.6-0.8) and 0.71 (0.6-0.8) in those over 28. The use of different basic hypotheses (cumulative time of pregnancy in women's life, withdrawal or restarting of the clock after each event in the case of recurrence) resulted in slight modification of the age cut-off points and the amplitude of RR also differed, but their order relative to SV categories was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: At the individual level knowledge of SV allowed a good estimate of a woman's attitude to an unwanted pregnancy, and SV must be taken into consideration when future actions are planned.