PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15283478

Individual differences in temporal information processing in humans.

Elzbieta Szelag·Magdalena Kanabus·Iwona Kolodziejczyk·Joanna Kowalska·Joanna Szuchnik
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This article reviews some of our investigations concerning individual differences in temporal information processing. Two different levels of temporal information processing are discussed, namely the low-frequency (i.e., a few seconds time range) and the high-frequency processing level (i.e., some tens of milliseconds range) of temporal information with respect to various experimental paradigms. Evidence has been obtained indicating that the processing of temporal information on these two levels can be influenced by various subject-related factors, out of which age, gender, developmental disorders, auditory experience and localisation of damage in the brain seem to be the most significant.

Explore related subjects

Autistic DisorderChildChild DevelopmentFemaleHearingHumansIndividualityLanguageMaleSex CharacteristicsTime PerceptionJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Elzbieta Szelag, Magdalena Kanabus, Iwona Kolodziejczyk, Joanna Kowalska, Joanna Szuchnik. 2004. Individual differences in temporal information processing in humans.. https://doi.org/10.55782/ane-2004-1519

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

[Superficial X-ray therapy of lip cancer after chronic excessive sun exposure of a 47-year-old autistic painter].

A 47-year-old autistic painter developed lip cancer after chronic excessive sun exposure. As she feared sun withdrawal during inpatient surgical excision, she refused this first-line treatment and therefore received outpatient X-ray therapy. The reason why she developed premature lip cancer and refused to stay in a hospital and the way she illustrated her "sun addiction" in her pictures is presented. Two years later she was free of recurrence. She has remained a sun worshipper until now, but after X-ray therapy she used daily sunscreens with very high sun protection factors, which attenuated the actinic damage. Considering the specific personality of the autistic painter, outpatient radiation therapy was a good alternative to inpatient surgery.

Autistic Disorder↗
PubMed2005

Cytogenetic abnormalities and fragile-X syndrome in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Autism is a behavioral disorder with impaired social interaction, communication, and repetitive and stereotypic behaviors. About 5-10 % of individuals with autism have 'secondary' autism in which an environmental agent, chromosome abnormality, or single gene disorder can be identified. Ninety percent have idiopathic autism and a major gene has not yet been identified. We have assessed the incidence of chromosome abnormalities and Fragile X syndrome in a population of autistic patients referred to our laboratory. METHODS: Data was analyzed from 433 patients with autistic traits tested using chromosome analysis and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or molecular testing for fragile X syndrome by Southern and PCR methods. RESULTS: The median age was 4 years. Sex ratio was 4.5 males to 1 female [354:79]. A chromosome (cs) abnormality was found in 14/421 [3.33 %] cases. The aberrations were: 4/14 [28%] supernumerary markers; 4/14 [28%] deletions; 1/14 [7%] duplication; 3/14 [21%] inversions; 2/14 [14%] translocations. FISH was performed on 23 cases for reasons other than to characterize a previously identified cytogenetic abnormality. All 23 cases were negative. Fragile-X testing by Southern blots and PCR analysis found 7/316 [2.2 %] with an abnormal result. The mutations detected were: a full mutation (fM) and abnormal methylation in 3 [43 %], mosaic mutations with partial methylation of variable clinical significance in 3 [43%] and a permutation carrier [14%]. The frequency of chromosome and fragile-X abnormalities appears to be within the range in reported surveys (cs 4.8-1.7%, FRAX 2-4%). Limitations of our retrospective study include paucity of behavioral diagnostic information, and a specific clinical criterion for testing. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-eight percent of chromosome abnormalities detected in our study were subtle; therefore a high resolution cytogenetic study with a scrutiny of 15q11.2q13, 2q37 and Xp23.3 region should be standard practice when the indication is autism. The higher incidence of mosaic fragile-X mutations with partial methylation compared to FRAXA positive population [50% vs 15-40%] suggests that faint bands and variations in the Southern band pattern may occur in autistic patients.

Autistic Disorder↗