Immediate Risk-Stratification Improves Survival (IRIS): study protocol.

Gerhard Steinbeck; Dietrich Andresen; Jochen Senges; Ellen Hoffmann; Karlheinz Seidl; Johannes Brachmann; IRIS Investigators as Joint Study of the German University Hospitals and German Society of Leading Cardiological Hospital Physicians (ALKK)

doi:10.1016/j.eupc.2004.04.008

PubMed · 15294263

Immediate Risk-Stratification Improves Survival (IRIS): study protocol.

Gerhard Steinbeck·Dietrich Andresen·Jochen Senges·Ellen Hoffmann·Karlheinz Seidl·Johannes Brachmann·IRIS Investigators as Joint Study of the German University Hospitals and German Society of Leading Cardiological Hospital Physicians (ALKK)

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been shown to be effective for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death only in selected groups of patients in the chronic phase after myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Immediate Risk-Stratification Improves Survival (IRIS) Study compares ICD therapy with no ICD therapy in selected high risk patients early after myocardial infarction. Special emphasis is placed on optimal acute and long term medical therapy in all patients including metoprolol CR/ZOK. The hypothesis is tested that use of the ICD reduces overall mortality. For that purpose, consecutive acute ST elevation or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients are collected in a registry. From this denominator, patients are screened, and enrolled early after myocardial infarction (day 5 to day 31) if they exhibit both a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40% and a heart rate > or =100 bpm on the first available electrocardiogram (criterion I), or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia at a rate > or =150 bpm during Holter (criterion II). CONCLUSIONS: IRIS is a large scale prospective, randomized trial to evaluate the benefit of ICD therapy for reduction of total mortality in patients considered at high risk of sudden death early after acute myocardial infarction.

Explore related subjects

Clinical Protocols Death, Sudden, Cardiac Defibrillators, Implantable Follow-Up Studies Heart Rate Humans Myocardial Infarction Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Risk Assessment Stroke Volume Tachycardia, Ventricular Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Gerhard Steinbeck, Dietrich Andresen, Jochen Senges, Ellen Hoffmann, Karlheinz Seidl, Johannes Brachmann, IRIS Investigators as Joint Study of the German University Hospitals and German Society of Leading Cardiological Hospital Physicians (ALKK). 2004. Immediate Risk-Stratification Improves Survival (IRIS): study protocol.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eupc.2004.04.008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Implementation of a data management program in a pediatric cancer unit in a low income country.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric cancer units in low-income countries lack data on which to base quality improvement initiatives. We implemented a data management program in the oncology unit of the children's hospital of Tegucigalpa, Honduras, and then we assessed training and supervision of data managers, data accuracy, and completeness as well as obstacles encountered. METHODS: Training included 2 days of off-site hands-on instruction in the use of an online database, daily on-site supervision by physicians, periodic online meetings for education and problem-solving, and continuous e-mail support. RESULTS: Of the 652 patients diagnosed with acute leukemia between July 1995 and June 2005, 150 (23%) had not yet been registered in the database at the time of audit and 65 (10%) had missing medical records. The remaining 437 charts (67%) were reviewed by an external auditor and compared to the data entered previously by the two trained data managers. Protocol information was incomplete in 30% of cases, and the cause of death was inaccurate in 18%. All other data were 99% accurate and 93%-100% complete. Obstacles included a limited medical records system, poor organization of the charts, missing records, inconsistently documented protocol information, data managers who lack a medical background, and slow or unreliable internet connections. CONCLUSION: Data managers can be trained to effectively collect basic pediatric oncology data in a low-income country. Addressing inadequacies in the medical record system while providing specific training in protocol-based care and determination of cause of death for both physicians and data managers will improve data quality.

Clinical Protocols↗

PubMed2007

Creation of a CT Image Library for the Lung Screening Study of the National Lung Screening Trial.

The CT Image Library (CTIL) of the Lung Screening Study (LSS) network of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) consists of up to three annual screens using CT imaging from each of 17,308 participants with a significant history of smoking but no evidence of cancer at trial enrollment (Fall 2002-Spring 2004). Screens performed at numerous medical centers associated with 10 LSS-NLST screening centers are deidentified of protected health information and delivered to the CTIL via DVD, external hard disk, or Internet/Virtual Private Network transmission. The collection will be completed in late 2006. The CTIL is of potential interest to clinical researchers and software developers of nodule detection algorithms. Its attractiveness lies in its very specific, well-defined patient population, scanned via a common CT protocol, and in its collection of evenly spaced serial screens. In this work, we describe the technical details of the CTIL collection process from screening center retrieval through library storage.

Clinical Protocols↗

PubMed2006

The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Stepped wedge randomised trial designs involve sequential roll-out of an intervention to participants (individuals or clusters) over a number of time periods. By the end of the study, all participants will have received the intervention, although the order in which participants receive the intervention is determined at random. The design is particularly relevant where it is predicted that the intervention will do more good than harm (making a parallel design, in which certain participants do not receive the intervention unethical) and/or where, for logistical, practical or financial reasons, it is impossible to deliver the intervention simultaneously to all participants. Stepped wedge designs offer a number of opportunities for data analysis, particularly for modelling the effect of time on the effectiveness of an intervention. This paper presents a review of 12 studies (or protocols) that use (or plan to use) a stepped wedge design. One aim of the review is to highlight the potential for the stepped wedge design, given its infrequent use to date. METHODS: Comprehensive literature review of studies or protocols using a stepped wedge design. Data were extracted from the studies in three categories for subsequent consideration: study information (epidemiology, intervention, number of participants), reasons for using a stepped wedge design and methods of data analysis. RESULTS: The 12 studies included in this review describe evaluations of a wide range of interventions, across different diseases in different settings. However the stepped wedge design appears to have found a niche for evaluating interventions in developing countries, specifically those concerned with HIV. There were few consistent motivations for employing a stepped wedge design or methods of data analysis across studies. The methodological descriptions of stepped wedge studies, including methods of randomisation, sample size calculations and methods of analysis, are not always complete. CONCLUSION: While the stepped wedge design offers a number of opportunities for use in future evaluations, a more consistent approach to reporting and data analysis is required.

Clinical Protocols↗