PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15315040

Spinal fusion using bone morphogenetic proteins.

Harvinder Sandhu
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dr. Harvinder Sandhu, one of the lead investigators in clinical trials that resulted in the approval of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP) for spinal fusion, updates Orthopedics on the current status of BMPs.

Explore related subjects

Bone Morphogenetic ProteinsBone TransplantationClinical Trials as TopicHumansSpinal FusionTransplantation, AutologousInterview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Harvinder Sandhu. 2004. Spinal fusion using bone morphogenetic proteins.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-20040701-10

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

IL-1beta and BMPs--interactive players of cartilage matrix degradation and regeneration.

Intact human adult articular cartilage is central for the functioning of the articulating joints. This largely depends on the integrity of its extracellular matrix, given the high loading forces during movements in particular in the weight-bearing joints. Unlike the first impression of a more or less static tissue, articular cartilage shows - albeit in the adult organism a slow--tissue turnover. Thus, one of the most important questions in osteoarthritis research is to understand the balance of catabolic and anabolic factors in articular cartilage as this is the key to understand the biology of cartilage maintenance and degeneration. Anabolic and catabolic pathways are very much intermingled in articular cartilage. The balance between anabolism and catabolism is titrated on numerous levels, starting from the mediator-synthesizing cells which express either catabolic or anabolic factors. Also, on the level of the effector cells (i.e. chondrocytes) anabolic and catabolic gene expression compete for a balance of matrix homeostasis, namely the synthesis of matrix components and the expression and activation of matrix-degrading proteases. Also, there are multiple layers of intracellular cross-talks in between the anabolic and catabolic signalling pathways. Maybe the most important lesson from this overview is the notion that the anabolic-catabolic balance as such counts and not so much sufficient net anabolism or limited catabolism alone. Thus, it might be neither the aim of osteoarthritis therapy to foster anabolism nor to knock down catabolism, but the balance of anabolic-catabolic activities as a total might need proper titration and balancing.

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Upregulation of ID protein by growth and differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) through a smad-dependent and MAPK-independent pathway in HUVSMC.

GDF5 (growth and differentiation factor five), a member of the TGF-beta superfamily, binds specifically to BMPR1b, BMPR2 and ACTR2a receptors forming a heterodimeric complex, thereby inducing phosphorylation of smad1, 5, 8 and translocation to the nucleus. ID1 (inhibitor of differentiation or DNA binding) is essential for G1 to S phase transition inhibiting DNA binding thereby playing an important role in the control of differentiation, proliferation and angiogenesis. The objective of this study was, therefore, to characterize the signal transduction pathway of GDF5, especially the involvement of ID1, in human umbilical vein smooth muscle cells (HUVSMC). We observed the expression of BMPR1a, BMPR1b, BMPR2, ACTR2a, smad1, smad 5, ID1, ID2 and ID3 in HUVSMC. Application of GDF5 upregulated ID1 and ID3 expression by involvement of the smad signaling pathway. GDF5 caused phorsphorylation of smad1 followed by upregulation of ID1 and ID3. Co-incubation with anti-GDF5 prevented these effects. GDF5 significantly inhibited phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and induced phosphorylation of ERK. The specific inhibitor of p38 MAPK or ERK, SB203580 or U0126 did not induce ID protein expression. Smad1 siRNA transfection inhibited the upregulation of ID protein. GDF5 had chemotactic activity in HUVSMC; this effect was partly blocked by transfection of smad1 or ID1 siRNA. Our results indicate that GDF5 induces ID1 and ID3 in HUVSMC by a smad-dependent, MAPK-independent pathway. GDF5 binds to specific receptors, thereby inducing phosphorylation and translocation of smad1 to the nucleus where it is involved in the regulation of transcription. Since ID1 has been shown to be crucial for cell cycle control, we propose that GDF5 could be involved in the process of angiogenesis.

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Transcriptomes of human prostate cells.

BACKGROUND: The gene expression profiles of most human tissues have been studied by determining the transcriptome of whole tissue homogenates. Due to the solid composition of tissues it is difficult to study the transcriptomes of individual cell types that compose a tissue. To overcome the problem of heterogeneity we have developed a method to isolate individual cell types from whole tissue that are a source of RNA suitable for transcriptome profiling. RESULTS: Using monoclonal antibodies specific for basal (integrin beta4), luminal secretory (dipeptidyl peptidase IV), stromal fibromuscular (integrin alpha 1), and endothelial (PECAM-1) cells, respectively, we separated the cell types of the prostate with magnetic cell sorting (MACS). Gene expression of MACS-sorted cell populations was assessed with Affymetrix GeneChips. Analysis of the data provided insight into gene expression patterns at the level of individual cell populations in the prostate. CONCLUSION: In this study, we have determined the transcriptome profile of a solid tissue at the level of individual cell types. Our data will be useful for studying prostate development and cancer progression in the context of single cell populations within the organ.

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins↗