PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15373277

Dissociative processes, multiple personality, and dream functions.

Petr Bob
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

From ancient times on, our dream processes were thought to be the uncovering of unknown connections. It may be that there is some basis to this belief and that dreams truly represent a mirror of our unconscious and not only random processes moving along according to some brain "computation." These ideas are supported by some findings that involve connections among dissociative processes, hypnosis, and multiple personality disorder (MPD). From this point of view, MPD represents a very interesting theoretical problem, which may be understood as an extreme example of the dissociative nature of the human psyche. This in turn leads to an understanding of the complex structure of the human psyche and corresponds perfectly to our experience, which says that the pathological often sheds new light on the normal and physiological.

Explore related subjects

Dissociative DisordersDissociative Identity DisorderDreamsHumansModels, PsychologicalUnconscious, PsychologyJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Petr Bob. 2004. Dissociative processes, multiple personality, and dream functions.. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2004.58.2.139

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Acute stress reactions in the first 3 weeks postpartum: a study of 219 parturients.

OBJECTIVES: There is increasing research on posttraumatic stress (PS) 4-6 weeks and 3 months postpartum, but, there are no data on acute stress reactions (ASR) in the first 3 weeks postpartum, i.e. the potential precursors of PS. However, ASR may have long-term effects, e.g., on a subsequent pregnancy without having manifested as PS in the meantime. We propose: (i) to describe the patterns of ASR after childbirth, (ii) to explore differences between women with normal and traumatogenic ASR, and (iii) to provide data on the early detection of traumatogenic ASR 2 and 3 weeks postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: Intra-event variables (relationship with caregivers, overall birth experience, and dissociative experiences, as well as obstetric variables) were assessed 48-96 h. postpartum, as were ASR (by means of the Impact-of-Event Scale IES) in weeks 1, 2, and 3 postpartum. According to research on PS the upper 33%-range of ASR in weeks 2 and 3 was defined as 'traumatogenic'. RESULTS: Normal ASR in week 1 are at a level which in non-obstetric trauma-situations is considered as the upper range of low stress or lower range of medium distress. ASR decline constantly from week 1 to week 3. However, high ASR in week 1 do not drop faster than do low ones, thus indicating a prolonged stress reaction in women with high ASR in week 1. Low ASR (IES-scores <10) and high ASR (IES-scores >20) in week 1 are highly predictive for normal ASR, and traumatogenic ASR in weeks 2 and 3, respectively. Medium ASR (IES-scores 10-20) in week 1 are of uncertain predictive value for stress reactions in weeks 2 and 3 and have to be re-assessed at that time. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical screening for ASR appears to be helpful in detecting women with a compromised ability to process childbirth-related stress. The association between ASR and long-term development should be further explored.

Dissociative Disorders↗
PubMed2006

Role and timing of GTP binding and hydrolysis during EF-G-dependent tRNA translocation on the ribosome.

The translocation of tRNA and mRNA through the ribosome is promoted by elongation factor G (EF-G), a GTPase that hydrolyzes GTP during the reaction. Recently, it was reported that, in contrast to previous observations, the affinity of EF-G was much weaker for GTP than for GDP and that ribosome-catalyzed GDP-GTP exchange would be required for translocation [Zavialov AV, Hauryliuk VV, Ehrenberg M (2005) J Biol 4:9]. We have reinvestigated GTP/GDP binding and show that EF-G binds GTP and GDP with affinities in the 20 to 40 microM range (37 degrees C), in accordance with earlier reports. Furthermore, GDP exchange, which is extremely rapid on unbound EF-G, is retarded, rather than accelerated, on the ribosome, which, therefore, is not a nucleotide-exchange factor for EF-G. The EF-G.GDPNP complex, which is very labile, is stabilized 30,000-fold by binding to the ribosome. These findings, together with earlier kinetic results, reveal that EF-G enters the pretranslocation ribosome in the GTP-bound form and indicate that, upon ribosome-complex formation, the nucleotide-binding pocket of EF-G is closed, presumably in conjunction with GTPase activation. GTP hydrolysis is required for rapid tRNA-mRNA movement, and P(i) release induces further rearrangements of both EF-G and the ribosome that are required for EF-G turnover.

Dissociative Disorders↗