PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1539823

Force applied during tracheal intubation.

Abstract

This study quantitated the force applied during tracheal intubation to determine (a) whether the force differed among novice and experienced intubators, and (b) whether the force required differed when intubating patients' tracheas versus intubating the trachea of a commonly used training mannequin. We studied 27 tracheal intubations performed by 17 experienced (greater than 100 prior intubations) and 10 novice (less than 10 prior intubations) intubators. Each intubation was performed with a No. 3 Macintosh blade instrumented with strain gauges to determine force applied in the sagittal plane. The mean force applied was 24.6 +/- 2.9 N (mean +/- SEM) and the maximum force applied by each intubator was 47.6 +/- 3.8 N. There was no difference between groups in the mean force applied (28.8 +/- 6.1 N for the novice group vs 22.3 +/- 2.7 N for the experienced group, P = 0.27) nor in the maximum force applied (55.1 +/- 6.5 N for the novice group vs 43.2 +/- 4.7 N for the experienced group, P = 0.08). The only difference was in the impulse (force x duration), which was more for the novice group largely because of the longer average duration of intubation (40 +/- 12 s vs 19 +/- 4 s, P = 0.06). Among experienced intubators, we found that applied force correlated with patient weight and Mallampati class. Intubation of the Laerdal Airway Management Trainer required mean forces comparable to those required in patients (26.6 +/- 2.5 N vs 22.3 +/- 2.9 N), although the maximum force applied during the intubation effort was greater (58.3 +/- 4.7 N vs 43.2 +/- 4.7 N, P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Bishop, R M Harrington, A F Tencer. 1992. Force applied during tracheal intubation.. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199203000-00016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗