PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15467320

Progress through sound and vision.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Scarsbrook, F V Gleeson. Progress through sound and vision.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000080627

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review.

The objective of this chapter is to relate the image findings of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) to structural changes of adenomyosis; in order to clarify the present clinical diagnostic approach in the diagnosis of adenomyosis, the performance of TVS is evaluated in comparison to other diagnostic modalities. A Medline search of papers in English on the use of TVS and needle biopsy for the diagnosis of adenomyosis was carried out. It was found that TVS is highly observer-dependent, but in the hands of experienced investigators it has an adequate diagnostic accuracy in clinically suspected cases. The diagnostic accuracy of TVS is at an intermediate level but is in line with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in unselected patients without myomas undergoing surgery. TVS is a sufficiently accurate tool for diagnosis of adenomyosis in clinically suspected cases, but not in unselected premenopausal women with myomas. Resectoscopic hysteroscopic biopsy has not been sufficiently evaluated but could be a useful diagnostic tool, whereas needle biopsy is not. In conclusion, in clinically suspected adenomyosis cases TVS should be favoured as the primary diagnostic tool. Substantial experience and specific training is required for TVS to be a useful diagnostic tool in adenomyosis. MRI may be considered when TVS is inconclusive. Clinicians should above all be observant of image findings of adenomyosis in patients with no wish to preserve fertility.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Reproducibility of gene expression signature-based predictions in replicate experiments.

PURPOSE: The goals of this analysis were to (a) determine concordance of gene expression results from replicate experiments, (b) examine prediction agreement of multigene predictors on replicate data, and (c) assess the robustness of prediction results in the face of noise. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Affymetrix U133A gene chips were used for gene expression profiling of 97 fine-needle aspiration biopsies from breast cancer. Thirty-five cases were profiled in replicates: 17 within the same laboratory, 11 in two different laboratories, and 15 to assess manual and robotic labeling. We used data from 62 cases to develop 111 distinct pharmacogenomic predictors of response to therapy. These were tested on cases profiled in duplicates to determine prediction agreement and accuracy. To evaluate the robustness of the pharmacogenomic predictors, we also introduced random noise into the informative genes in one half of the replicates. RESULTS: The average concordance correlation coefficient was 0.978 (range, 0.96-0.99) for intralaboratory replicates, 0.962 (range, 0.94-0.98) for between-laboratory replicates, and 0.971 (range, 0.93-0.99) for manual versus robotic labeling. The mean % prediction agreement on replicate data was 97% (95% CI, 0.96-0.98; SD, 0.006), 92% (95% CI, 0.90-0.93; SD, 0.009), and 94% (95% CI, 0.92-0.95; SD, 0.008) for support vector machines, diagonal linear discriminant analysis, and k-nearest neighbor prediction methods, respectively. Mean accuracy in the test set was 77% (95% CI, 0.74-0.79; SD, 0.014), 66% (95% CI, 0.63-0.73; SD, 0.015), and 64% (95% CI, 0.60-0.67; SD, 0.016), respectively. CONCLUSION: Gene expression results obtained with Affymetrix U133A chips are highly reproducible within and across two high-volume laboratories. Pharmacogenomic predictions yielded >90% agreement in replicate data.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Pathological diagnosis of paediatric tumours from image-guided needle core biopsies: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Image-guided core needle biopsy is widely used in paediatric oncology, but many protocols continue to discourage this practice. No published randomized studies compare image-guided needle biopsy with surgical techniques. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature on image-guided core needle biopsy in paediatric oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Several computerized databases were searched using the terms [(needle OR core) AND (biops*[ti]) AND (paediatric OR pediatric OR child OR children OR childhood OR boy OR girl)[ti]] to identify series of more than five cases of needle core biopsy for tumour diagnosis in children. Data from included studies were combined to calculate pooled estimates of adequacy, accuracy and complication rates. RESULTS: Thirteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall biopsy adequacy rate (defined as sufficient to make a diagnosis) was 94% (95% CI 92-96%). The diagnostic accuracy rate in cases with adequate material (defined as achieving the correct specific diagnosis) was 94% (95% CI 92-96%). Complications requiring treatment occurred in 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Available pooled data suggest that about 95% of image-guided needle core biopsies provide an adequate sample for diagnosis of malignant disease in childhood. In such cases, the pathological diagnosis is correct in about 95%. Complications are rare.

Biopsy, Needle↗