[A strategy for assessing environmental influence on airway allergy using a regression binary tree-based method].

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the living environment factors that increase the risk of allergic sensitization to house dust mites, we applied a regression binary tree-based method (CART, Classification & Regression Trees) to an epidemiological study on airway allergy. The utility of the tree map in personal sanitary guidance for preventing allergic sensitization was examined with respect to feasibility and validity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was given to 386 healthy adult women, asking them about their individual living environments. Also, blood samples were collected to measure Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp)-specific IgE, the presence/absence of Dp-sensitization being expressed as positive/negative. The questionnaire consisted of nine items on (1) home ventilation by keeping windows open, (2) personal or family smoking habits, (3) use of air conditioners in hot weather, (4) type of flooring (tatami/wooden/carpet) in the living room, (5) visible mold proliferation in the kitchen, (6) type of housing (concrete/wooden), (7) residential area (heavy or light traffic area) (8) heating system (use of unventilated combustion appliances), and (9) frequency of cleaning (every day or less often). There also were queries on the past history of airway allergic diseases, such as bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis. CART and a multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLRA) were performed. The subjects were first classified into two groups, with and without a history of airway allergic diseases (Groups WPH and WOPH). In each group, the involvement of living environment factors in Dp-sensitization was examined using CART and MLRA. RESULTS: In the MLRA study, individual living environment factors showed promotional or suppressive effects on Dp-sensitization with differences between the two groups. With respect to the CART results, the two groups were first split by the factor that had the most significant odds ratio for MLRA. In Group WPH, which had a Dp-sensitization risk of 19.5%, the first split was by the factor of visible mold proliferation in the kitchen into the factor-present group with a risk value of 45.5% and the factor-absent group with 13.5%. The mold proliferation group was split with reference to frequent cleaning, and the risk rose to 75% in the factor-absent group and to 100% when family smoking habits were reported. Group WOPH (the risk: 10.8%) was first split into two groups according to the use of air conditioners in hot weather for more than 6 hours a day or less, which showed risk values of 16.7% and 6.9%, respectively. The risk of the group that intensively used air conditioners fell to 8.3% with tatami as flooring in the living room, and, if others, rose to 20.8%. The risk of the factor-lacking group fell to 4.0% without wooden flooring. CONCLUSIONS: CART analysis enables us to express complex relationships between living environment factors and Dp-sensitization simply by a binary regression tree, pointing to preventive strategies that can be flexibly changed according to the individual living environments of the subjects.