PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15484171

Partnering for quality.

Abstract

This article discusses efforts being made by multiple stakeholders to improve quality and safety in intensive care units (ICUs). The Leapfrog Group (Washington, DC), a consortium of purchasers, is reaching for quality by implementing safety standards. One standard, staffing ICUs with intensivists, is associated with a 30% reduction in hospital mortality and a 40% reduction in ICU mortality. While Leapfrog is addressing quality improvements on a structural level, JCAHO is developing empiric measures for ICU quality, which are being beta tested, to complement Leapfrogs' efforts. JCAHO used rigorously defined processes to develop and refine these measures. These measures include deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis, catheter-related blood stream infections, mortality and length of stay-APACHE III risk adjustment. Finally, ICU providers at Hopkins implemented an 8-step unit-based safety program. This comprehensive program is run at the unit level, works to improve safety culture, addresses staff safety concerns, partners hospital leaders with unit workers, helps staff implement improvement initiatives, uses rigorous data collection methods, and easily disseminated in other clinical areas. Providers can frame their efforts after 3 fundamental concepts from these initiatives: create a culture that supports quality and safety, standardize work processes by reducing complexity and using independent redundancy, and automate. The take home message is, when we come to work every day, we must be committed to quality and safety, and lead our teams to do the same.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter J Pronovost, Christine G Holzmueller. 2004. Partnering for quality.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Impact of simple interventions on neonatal mortality in a low-resource teaching hospital in India.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate impact of simple interventions on neonatal mortality in a low-resource teaching hospital in India. STUDY DESIGN: Before-and-after intervention trial setting: limited resource teaching hospital; DESIGN: Before and after study. INTERVENTIONS: A package of simple interventions was evolved. The interventions included: rational admissions and early discharge, entrusting mothers in care-giving, enforcing asepsis routines, aggressive enteral feeding, abandoning unnecessary interventions, protocol-based management, rational antibiotics and training and empowerment of nurses. STATISTICAL METHODS: The categorical and continuous variables were compared with chi (2) and two-tailed tests, respectively. RESULTS: Neonatal mortality rate declined significantly during the intervention period as compared to control period (20.3 versus 29.3 per 1000 live births; relative risk 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.85). Most significant decline occurred in sepsis-related deaths. The survival of neonates with birth weight 1000 to 1499 improved over two folds (56.7% versus 24.5%, P<0.01). There was a significant decline in antibiotics use (635/878, 72.3% versus 299/897, 23.2%; P=0.00). The duration of stay in neonatal unit was decreased by a mean of 1.5 day (95% CI 0.9 to 2.8 days) after interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Simple interventions can result in a significant decline in neonatal mortality in hospitals with limited resources. This package is likely to be effective in hospitals with a high proportion of the sepsis deaths.

Hospital Mortality↗