PubMed · 15494856
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Giuseppe Viale. 2004. An alternative viewpoint.. https://doi.org/10.1177/106689690401200403
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Axillary hair is a highly conserved phenotypical feature in humans, and as such deserves at least consideration of its functional significance. Protection from environmental factors is one of the main functions attributed to hair in furred vertebrates, but is believed to be inapplicable to humans. I considered the hypothesis that the phenotypic preservation of axillary hair is due to its unrecognized role in the organism protection. Two immediate questions arise--what exactly is being protected and what it is protected from. A large group of axillary lymph nodes represents a major difference between underarms and the adjacent areas of the trunk. The consideration of potential factors from which hair can offer protection identifies sunlight as the most likely candidate. Intense sweat production underarms may represent an independent defense mechanism, specifically protecting lymph nodes from overheating. Moreover, the pattern of facial hair growth in males strikingly overlaps with the distribution of superficial lymph nodes, suggesting potential role for facial hair in protection of lymph nodes, and possibly thymus and thyroid. The idea of lymph node protection from environmental mutagenic factors, such as UV radiation and heat, appears particularly important in light of wide association of lymph nodes with cancers. The position of contemporary fashion towards body hair is aggressively negative, including the social pressure for removal of axillary and bikini line hair for women, facial hair for men in many professional occupations, and even body hair for men. If this hypothesis is proven to be true, the implications will be significant for immunology (by providing new insights in lymph node physiology), health sciences (depilation is painful and therefore easily modifiable habit if proven to increase disease risk), as well as art, social fashion and economy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
AIMS: The aim of the present study is to clarify the level of radioactive lymph node should be biopsied after the most radioactive SN is removed. METHODS: SNB using radionuclide was performed in our hospital for 1179 primary breast cancers between April 2000 and October 2005; most (1177/1179) were performed successfully. Our criterion for harvesting SNs is to remove tissue until no radioactive site is present. The level of radioactivity and the order of removal of each lymph node were compared with pathologic results. RESULTS: More than 2 (overall average 1.9) radioactive SNs were biopsied in 686 of 1177 breasts. Cancer positive results were recorded for 142 breasts with multiple SNs. In 142 breasts, 64 showed metastasis to the most radioactive node only, 39 showed metastasis other than the most radioactive node only, and 39 showed the most radioactive node and other radioactive nodes. Moreover, if several other criteria were applied, false-positive cases were increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to harvest radioactive lymph nodes other than the most radioactive. Moreover, efforts to remove every radioactive lymph node will minimize false-negative results.