PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1553699

[Initial evaluation and treatment, selection by priority].

Abstract

Mortality from severe multitrauma is 25-30%. Haemorrhage is the cause of one third of the deaths, either directly or indirectly as the cause of organ failure. Many trauma victims will not present alarming symptoms shortly after the accident. When high energy trauma is suspected the patient should be admitted to a resource hospital with the relevant expertise for systematic evaluation. Control over the airways and venous access should be obtained within minutes, and it should be established whether the patient is bleeding so much as to warrant emergency operation. The diagnostic work-up should have been completed within two to three hours. All severely injured patients should be treated initially at the same location, following the same routines. Due to risk of overlooking injuries, patients should not be sorted by surgical specialty in the field. Obstructed airways are more acutely life-threatening than inadequate respiration, which is more serious than decreased circulation, which is again more dangerous than impaired consciousness. In general, thoracic injuries take priority over abdominal, cerebral and orthopaedic injuries, in that order.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Pillgram-Larsen, K Solheim. 1992-02-10. [Initial evaluation and treatment, selection by priority].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1553699/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Emergency services in Norway. A questionnaire study].

A questionnaire survey of primary health care emergency services in Norway (1991) covered 71 municipalities organized into 43 regions containing about 15% of the Norwegian population. The large cities are excluded. Long distances to travel and frequent duty periods cause some problems, but not for the majority of the population or doctors who participated in the survey. In several regions, a significant part of the service is covered by locums. Written directives for the services are rare. The availability of the doctor on duty falls short several places, owing to lack of satisfactory routines and the occasional need to accompany a patient to hospital. In more than half the regions communication systems are unsatisfactory and will have to be upgraded. In almost half the regions emergency telephone calls are sometimes answered by staff without a medical background. A code of practice or central regulation are suggested as possible ways of improving the services.

Emergency Medical Services