PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15538792

Chiral separations using a polypeptide and polymeric dipeptide surfactant polyelectrolyte multilayer coating in open-tubular capillary electrochromatography.

Abstract

A polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM) coating consisting of the polypeptide, poly(l-lysine) hydrobromide, poly(l-lysine) and the polymeric dipeptide surfactant, poly(sodium undecanoyl-l-leucyl-alaninate), poly(l-SULA), is investigated as a new medium for the separation of chiral analytes in open-tubular capillary electrochromatography (OT-CEC). In this approach, a stable PEM is constructed in situ by alternative rinses of the cationic polymer poly(l-lysine) and the anionic polymer poly(l-SULA). In previous studies, the PEM coating has been constructed by use of the cationic polyelectrolyte poly (diallydimethylammonium chloride), PDADMAC. In this study, we investigate the use of a biopolymer as the cationic polyelectrolyte. The results reported here indicate an increase in selectivity and resolution when poly(l-lysine) is used as the cationic polymer in place of PDADMAC. To evaluate the chromatographic performance of the PEM coating as a chiral stationary phase, the separation of the beta-blockers, labetalol and sotalol, and the binaphthyl derivatives, 1,1'-bi-2-naphthyl-2,2'-dihydrogen phosphate, 1,1'-bi-2-naphthol, and 1,1-binaphthyl-2,2'-diamine, are investigated. In addition, the effect of varying the amino acid order of the polymeric dipeptide surfactant on resolution is investigated. The number of bilayers also significantly influences the separation efficiency and resolution of enantiomers. The run-to-run and capillary-to-capillary reproducibilities are evaluated by calculating the relative standard deviations (RSDs) of the electroosmotic flow. These RSD values were found to be less than 1%. The coating is also stable and allows more than 290 runs to be performed in the same capillary. In addition, coupling of this chiral OT-CEC column with mass spectrometry is investigated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mary W Kamande, Xiaofeng Zhu, Constantina Kapnissi-Christodoulou, Isiah M Warner. 2004-11-15. Chiral separations using a polypeptide and polymeric dipeptide surfactant polyelectrolyte multilayer coating in open-tubular capillary electrochromatography.. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac049313t

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Recent progress in the use of ionic polymers as pseudostationary phases for EKC.

This review concerns the introduction, characterization, and application of polymeric pseudostationary phases (PSPs) for EKC since 2004. Achiral and chiral polymers and separations are reviewed, as is the application of polymeric PSPs for the combination of EKC with mass spectrometric detection.

Chromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary↗

MEKC: an update focusing on practical aspects.

This paper reviews recent methodological and instrumental advances in MEKC. Improvements in sensitivity arising from the use of on-line sample concentration (sweeping, stacking, and combination of both protocols) and derivatization (in-capillary reactions and coupling with flow-injection systems) and improvements in resolution obtained by changing the composition of the BGE (e.g., with organic modifiers, ionic liquids, nonionic and zwitterionic surfactants, mixed micelles, and vesicles) or using coated capillaries are discussed in detail. In addition, MS and LIF spectroscopy are examined in relation to their advantages and restrictions as applied to MEKC analysis. Some thoughts on potential future directions are also expressed.

Chromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary↗

Comparison of migration models for acidic solutes in micellar electrokinetic chromatography.

The validity of two models that explain the migration of ionisable solutes in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), mobility model and retention factor model, has been tested. For this purpose, the mobility (mu) and retention factor (k) of a set of 10 phenolic compounds with different hydrophobicity and pKa values have been determined for several sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) concentrations and pH values, and fitted to the models. Results show that in general the retention factor model explains better the retention of ionisable solutes, although for hydrophilic compounds at low SDS concentration, mobility model can give better fits. The different drawbacks pointed out by several authors in relation to both models have been checked, and a deep evaluation of each one has been done. As a result we have observed that, while in the retention factor model the variation of k with pH and [SDS] always follows the same trend, the variation of mu with these variables mainly depends on the value of the binding constant of the neutral form of the solutes to the micelles, KHA(m), which plays a critical role in the fit of the mobility model. Also we provide rules and advices to set up the experimental conditions to apply each model to a particular solute.

Chromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary↗