PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15544824

The acromioclavicular joint.

Abstract

Acute injuries of the AC joint have a limited differential diagnosis. A thorough examination and appropriate radiographs can identify nearly all problems while ruling out tumors as a causal factor. AC injury frequently occurs with other fractures, dislocations, or soft tissue injury around the shoulder. The single unifying diagnosis one searches for in medical conditions is frequently absent in musculoskeletal injury. For effective management of AC separations, the primary care physician need only distinguish type I, II, and III injuries from surgically treated type IV, V, and VI injuries. Types I, II, and III injuries should be treated with pain control and progressive rehabilitation as described previously. Patients who have types IV, V, and VI injuries should be referred to an orthopedic surgeon. Chronic injuries of the AC joint are also clearly diagnosed by appropriate physical examination and radiographs. Steroid injections can aid in the diagnosis and management of these conditions. Injury to one shoulder component predisposes to other shoulder injuries. A thorough examination will reveal these other associated abnormalities that may not be part of the presenting complaint. With practice in the examination of the shoulder and intra-articular injections, the primary care physician can effectively treat most common AC conditions. Only after conservative measures fail is it necessary to refer the patient for surgical management.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Phyllis Montellese, Timothy Dancy. 2004. The acromioclavicular joint.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2004.07.011

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Shoulder function: the perfect compromise between mobility and stability.

Shoulder function is a compromise between mobility and stability. Its large mobility is based on the structure of the glenohumeral joint and simultaneous motion of all segments of the shoulder girdle. This requires fine-tuned muscle coordination. Given the joint's mobility, stability is mainly based on active muscle control with only a minor role for the glenohumeral capsule, labrum and ligaments. In this review factors influencing stability and mobility and their consequences for strength are discussed, with special attention to the effects of morphology, muscle function and sensory information.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗

Surgical treatment of symptomatic acromioclavicular joint problems: a systematic review.

Excision of the distal clavicle has become the mainstay of surgical treatment for acromioclavicular joint arthritis and osteolysis refractory to nonoperative management. Surgical options for symptomatic acromioclavicular joint abnormalities refractory to nonoperative treatment are the classic open distal clavicle excision, direct (superior) arthroscopic excision, and indirect (bursal) arthroscopic distal clavicle excision. We asked whether any of these three procedures provided a better result. We systematically reviewed the medical literature (Medline, EMBASE), assigned a level of evidence for available studies, and critically identified the flaws and biases in the studies to provide comparisons between the published reports. We limited the literature review to clinical reports in the English language published in peer-reviewed journals. The literature supports surgical excision, but the reports are all Level III or IV evidence consisting largely of retrospective case series. Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection has provided more "good or excellent" results than has the open procedure, but is comprised of low-level evidence. Distal clavicle resection has provided satisfactory results when combined with other procedures. Simple distal clavicle resection may have worse outcomes when performed after preceding trauma. The published reports of the removal of medial acromial and inferior distal clavicle osteophytes when performing subacromial decompression are conflicting and may increase post-operative acromioclavicular symptoms.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗

Treatment of grade III acromioclavicular joint injuries: a systematic review.

Although nonoperative treatment is considered the standard of care for the treatment of Grade I and II acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, the treatment of Grade III injuries is controversial. There are as many methods of nonoperative treatment as there are for operative stabilization. Most of the literature represents Level IV evidence with very few Level II and III studies upon which to base decisions. A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed to determine if Grade III AC joint separations are best treated operatively or nonoperatively. Based on limited low-evidence, nonoperative treatment was deemed more appropriate than traditional nonoperative treatments because the results of the latter were not clearly better and were associated with higher complication rates, longer convalescence, and longer time away from work and sport.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗