PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1554669

Gynaecologists' abortion practice.

C Francome·W D Savage
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the relation between gynaecologists' opinions on the provision of abortion and the service provided by the Health Service in their district and to investigate the methods used for second trimester abortion. DESIGN AND SETTING: A postal questionnaire sent three times to a 50% random sample of gynaecologists practising in the National Health Service (NHS) in 1989 in Great Britain. SUBJECTS: 343 of 396 practising gynaecologists, 87% of those selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of gynaecologists holding views or reporting practice. RESULTS: Although only 11% actually performed abortions beyond 20 weeks, 57% approved later operations in cases of rape and 85% for a threat to the woman's health; only 47% approved late abortion for schoolgirls under 16 years. Dilatation and evacuation was used by only 1% of NHS gynaecologists even though from 13 to 16 weeks it is a safe and efficient method. Although Government statistics report that vacuum aspiration is used in over one third of second trimester abortions, this is technically unlikely and was not confirmed by this study. Less than 50% of abortions in England and Wales are performed in the NHS yet fewer than 40% of gynaecologists reported problems in providing an abortion service. Overall 21% thought they were providing abortions for over 90% of the women resident in their districts, whereas only 2% of districts achieve this proportion in their home regional health authority. Overall 60% supported separating abortion work from general gynaecology, and 45% would like regional abortion units. Only 27% supported fertility control acquiring the status of a subspecialty. CONCLUSIONS: Accepting these suggestions would improve the service, reduce regional variations in provision, provide opportunities for research and could have an important effect in helping slow the world population increase.

Explore related subjects

Abortion, TherapeuticFemaleGynecologyHumansMaleMaternal AgeMinorsPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondUnited KingdomEmpirical ApproachGenetics and ReproductionNational Health ServiceAbortion, InducedAttitudeBehaviorData CollectionDelivery Of Health CareDeveloped CountriesEducationEuropeEvaluationFamily PlanningFertility Control, PostconceptionHealthHealth PersonnelHealth ServicesNational Health ServicesNorthern EuropePerceptionPhysiciansPregnancy, Second TrimesterPsychological FactorsReproductionResearch MethodologySampling StudiesStudiesSurveysTraining ActivitiesTraining ProgramsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Francome, W D Savage. 1992. Gynaecologists' abortion practice.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14476.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

The possibility of a universal declaration of biomedical ethics.

Statements on issues in biomedical ethics, purporting to represent international interests, have been put forth by numerous groups. Most of these groups are composed of thinkers in the tradition of European secularism, and do not take into account the values of other ethical systems. One fifth of the world's population is accounted for by Islam, which is a universal religion, with more than 1400 years of scholarship. Although many values are held in common by secular ethical systems and Islam, their inferences are different. The question, "Is it possible to derive a truly universal declaration of biomedical ethics?" is discussed here by examining the value and extent of personal autonomy in Western and Islamic biomedical ethical constructs. These constructs are then tested vis-à-vis the issue of abortion. It is concluded that having a universal declaration of biomedical ethics in practice is not possible, although there are many conceptual similarities and agreements between secular and Islamic value systems, unless a radical paradigm shift occurs in segments of the world's deliberative bodies. The appellation "universal" should not be used on deliberative statements unless the ethical values of all major schools of thought are satisfied.

Abortion, Therapeutic↗
PubMed2006

Information for patients undergoing a prenatal diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: Lack of information is a frequent complaint with regard to physicians dealing with prenatal diagnosis (PD). The aim of the study was to find out how information on PD was perceived by patients and if they considered that they had been correctly informed by their physicians. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in Lariboisière Hospital (Paris) with 86 patients undergoing prenatal diagnosis between 2001 and 2003. A 23-item questionnaire was given to patients after delivery or termination of pregnancy (TP). RESULTS: Fifty patients out of 86 answered the questionnaire. Twelve patients out of 50 underwent a TP. Information on foetal anomaly was insufficient for 11 patients out of 50 (22%). Some patients found the information too technical; others would like to see photos to illustrate the anomalies and the possible surgical repairs to be performed. Information was insufficient for one in four patients concerning maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. Information before amniocentesis was considered sufficient by 9 out of 10 patients. Information on the risks of TP was not given or not understood by 10 out of 12 patients. CONCLUSION: Information on prenatal diagnosis could be improved by using simple and accessible language, supported by written documents and photos for certain anomalies. More information should be given in cases of abstract anomalies and should be adapted to the social, ethnic and cultural background of the patient.

Abortion, Therapeutic↗