PubMed · 15557563
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Tom Vandor. 2004-11-23. Views on recertification.. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1041650
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The process of assessment report writing is a complex one, involving both the statistical evaluation of data and clinical methods of data interpretation to appropriately answer referral questions. Today, a computer often analyzes data generated in a psychological assessment, at least in part. In this article, the author focuses on the interaction between the decision-making processes of human clinicians and the test interpretations that are computer-based. The benefits and problems with computers in assessment are highlighted and are presented alongside the research on the validity of automated assessment, as well as research comparing clinicians and computers in the decision-making process. The author concludes that clinical judgment and computer-based test interpretation each have weaknesses. However, by using certain strategies to reduce clinicians' susceptibility to errors in decision making and to ensure that only valid computer-based test interpretations are used, clinicians can optimize the accuracy of conclusions that they draw in their assessment report.
In the UK, patients in urban areas consult primary health care more than rural patients for both trivial and serious conditions. This study, involving focus groups and interviews, examined rural/urban differences in accounts of patients' intentions around initial decisions to consult general practice. Findings suggest 'relationships' between doctors and patients and easier access to appointments could affect consulting in rural areas, while decision-making for urban patients tended to be more consumerist. Perceptions about access to different health services meant rural patients' decision-making in out-of-hours emergencies was complex. Rural/urban differences in demand could be affected by change in UK primary care provision.