PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15559700

Addressing ethical issues in everyday practice.

Abstract

In primary-care practice, just as in critical care, ethical dilemmas challenge pediatricians to make choices in the best interests of their patients. Parents are important to the growth and development of children and have broad responsibility for making virtually all decisions regarding nutrition, clothing, housing, education, religion, and medical care. Society's deference to parental choice promotes the value of family integrity, ensures the availability of an identifiable decision maker, and acknowledges the legitimate role parents play in shaping their child's development. However, pediatricians have obligations to assess and advocate for the best interests of their patients. This requires that physicians reach out to their patients and take the time to listen to children and to involve them in their own care. The proper role of a child in planning care depends less on chronologic age than on developmental and personal capacity. Even young children have a keen awareness of their own clinical situations and options and should be involved as best as is possible in decision making. All decision making for children should be collaborative among patients, parents, and professionals. A situation including an involved child, an informed parent, and a caring and compassionate caregiver working collaboratively is most likely to result in optimal decisions for pediatric patients. Bartholome concluded in 1995 that pediatricians should respect children for the persons they are in the process of becoming by being willing to assist them to participate to the extent of their capacity in making decisions about their health. Combining that view with fostering respect for the strongly held beliefs and values of parents is the direction pediatricians should travel to make decisions in the best interests of children.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alan R Fleischman, Lauren Collogan. 2004. Addressing ethical issues in everyday practice.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0090-4481-20041101-08

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medical science, culture, and truth.

There is a fairly closed circle between culture, language, meaning, and truth such that the world of a given culture is a world understood in terms of the meanings produced in that culture. Medicine is, in fact, a subculture of a powerful type and has its own language and understanding of the range of illnesses that affect human beings. So how does medicine get at the truth of people and their ills in such a way as to escape its own limited constructions? There is a way out of the closed circle implicit in the idea of a praxis and the engagement with reality that is central to it and the further possibility introduced by Jacques Lacan that signification is never comprehensive in relation to the subject's encounter with the real. I will explore both of these so as to develop a conception of truth that is apt for the knowledge that arises in the clinic.

Bioethical Issues↗

The practice of health care: wisdom as a model.

Reasoning and judgement in health care entail complex responses to problems whose demands typically derive from several areas of specialism at once. We argue that current evidence- or value-based models of health care reasoning, despite their virtues, are insufficient to account for responses to such problems exhaustively. At the same time, we offer reasons for contending that health professionals in fact engage in forms of reasoning of a kind described for millennia under the concept of wisdom. Wisdom traditions refer to forms of deliberation which combine knowledge, reflection and life experience with social, emotional and ethical capacities. Wisdom is key in dealing with problems which are vital to human affairs but lack prescribed solutions. Uncertainty and fluidity must be tolerated in seeking to resolve them. We illustrate the application of wisdom using cases in psychiatry, where non-technical aspects of problems are often prominent and require more systematic analysis than conventional approaches offer, but we argue that our thesis applies throughout the health care field. We argue for the relevance of a threefold model of reasoning to modern health care situations in which multifaceted teamwork and complex settings demand wise judgement. A model based on practical wisdom highlights a triadic process with features activating capacities of the self (professional), other (patient and/or carers and/or colleagues) and aspects of the problem itself. Such a framework could be used to develop current approaches to health care based on case review and experiential learning.

Bioethical Issues↗