PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15573313

[Function and dysfunction of the startle reaction in humans].

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT: The startle reaction is one of the fastest movements of human beings in response to a sensory stimulus. It is likely that the central nervous system uses the circuits of the SR for the execution of a ballistic movement. Evidence in favour of the participation of the startle reaction circuits in the execution of a ballistic movement has been gathered by combining the presentation of startle reaction-inducing stimuli with the imperative signal in a reaction time task experiment. In this situation, in which subjects are highly prepared for movement execution, the reaction becomes accelerated but the movement pattern is not modified. On top of that, acceleration is limited to the movement per se, and it does not involve the subjective perception of the movement. Impairment of the central control of the startle reaction may lead to excess or reduction of the response. One of the examples of excessive response is hyperekplexia, in which patients cannot avoid having a startle reaction to unexpected stimuli. Reduced startle reaction occurs in parkinsonism and, specially, in progressive supranuclear palsy. CONCLUSIONS: One of the best known mechanisms of control of the startle reaction is prepulse inhibition. This phenomenon is likely the consequence of sensory signal processing at the brainstem level. The role of the prepulse inhibition is to avoid disruption of the sensory processing by the interference of another input. Prepulse inhibition is abnormally reduced in patients with parkinsonism, as an expression of the abnormal control of brainstem circuits by the basal ganglia. It has been also found abnormal in patients with Huntington's disease and in some patients with dystonia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Valls-Solé. [Function and dysfunction of the startle reaction in humans].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15573313/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Motor commands contribute to human position sense.

The role of afferent inflow and efferent outflow (or command) signals in judgements of limb position has been debated for over a century. One way to assess this is to check for changes during complete paralysis, with the current view being that perceived movements or position changes do not usually accompany attempts to contract paralysed muscles. To re-examine this, we asked six naïve subjects to carry out a simple position-matching task at the wrist. In the absence of vision, subjects accurately perceived the position to which their right wrist had been moved by the experimenter by matching it with their left hand. There was no significant change in perception when position was matched during sustained flexion or extension efforts. Then we paralysed and anaesthetized the right arm with ischaemia in order to produce a 'phantom' hand. The perceived position of the wrist changed by more than 20 deg when subjects attempted to flex or extend their hand when it was paralysed and anaesthetized. Further studies showed that this illusion was not dependent on the way in which the paralysis was produced and that the size of the position illusion increased when the level of effort during paralysis increased. These results establish for the first time a definitive role for 'outflow' signals in position sense.

Efferent Pathways↗