PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15616500

Refractive error in premature infants.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and the degree of refractive error between the ages of 2 weeks and 6 months in premature infants without retinopathy of prematurity and to seek a correlation between refractive error and age at examination, birth weight, or gestational age. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this observational cross-sectional study, eye refraction in 390 premature infants, with no ocular pathology, was measured by cycloplegic retinoscopy at the age of 2 weeks to 6 months. A correlation was sought between refractive error and perinatal variables. RESULTS: Of the 390 infants reviewed, 347 (89%) had a refractive error and 43 (11%) were emmetropic in both eyes. Most of the infants were hyperopic (76.8%). Myopia was observed in only 11.9%. Astigmatism was found in 24.4% of the infants. The mean age at examination was 2.1 +/- 1 months; the mean birth weight was 1639 +/- 444 g, and the mean gestational age at birth was 32.2 +/- 2.4 weeks. The mean spherical equivalent of refraction was +1.56 +/- 1.82 diopters (D) in the right eye and +1.55 +/- 1.78 D in the left eye. Refractive error was positively correlated with age at examination ( R = 0.16, P = 0.001). The mean refractive error was +1.24 D in infants aged 1 month or less and reached +2.50 D at the age of 4 to 6 months. Refractive error was not correlated with birth weight or gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of refractive error in premature infants without retinopathy of prematurity in the first 6 months of life may be as high as 89%. Most of these infants are hyperopic. Eye refraction is correlated with age at examination, but not with birth weight or gestational age.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yokrat Ton, Yigal S Wysenbeek, Abraham Spierer. 2004. Refractive error in premature infants.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.09.002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Infant growth, development and tooth emergence patterns: A longitudinal study from birth to 6 years of age.

OBJECTIVE: To test the association of child's growth/development status and socioeconomic variables with dental emergence patterns. DESIGN: A sample of 359 children belonging to a birth cohort of over 5000 children born in 1993 in Pelotas (Brazil) was studied in 1998-1999. Previously trained observers collected birthweight, head circumference at birth, birth height, gestational age, smoking during pregnancy, child's sex and skin colour, height by age at 6 months of age, caries experience in the deciduous teeth, number of emerged teeth at 6 and 12 months of age and emergence stages of the first permanent molars at 6 years of age. Family income, parental educational attainment and anthropometric measurements were collected at children's homes. Poisson regression models were applied in order to select best predictors of pairs of emerged teeth at 6 and 12 months of age and emerged (yes/no) first permanent molars at 6 years of age. RESULTS: Children shorter than 49cm had, on average, less pairs of emerged teeth at 6 months of age. Twelve-month-old children with birth height < or =49cm, presenting height-for-age deficit at 6 months of age and the females also presented less pairs of emerged teeth. Stunted children at 6 months of age were more likely to have non-emerged first upper left and lower right permanent molars at 6 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Important developmental and nutritional variables at birth and throughout the early life may predict the numbers of emerged teeth children have in their oral cavity.

Birth Weight↗

Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of triplets.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence of neurodevelopmental disabilities in triplets and to find out possible connection between the outcome and perinatal events. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 94 triplets and their outcome at 24-144 months of age correlated with gestational age, birth weight, pregnancy complications, early neonatal period, neonatal cranial ultrasound, period of birth (1985-1995, 1996-2000) and type of antenatal care. RESULTS: Sixty-two triplets are healthy, 15 suffer cerebral palsy (CP) and 17 minimal cerebral dysfunction (MCD). Adverse outcome correlates significantly with prematurity, low birth weight and maternal age. In multivariate analysis, both cerebral palsy and minor disabilities correlate significantly with early neonatal complications, neonatal cranial ultrasound with later CP (p<0.01), and MCD with preterm rupture of membranes (p=0.047). Children conceived spontaneously do worse than those born after assisted reproduction (p=0.004), those born in the time period 1996-2000 do better than those born before (p=0.021). Seventy-seven percent (77%) of newborns delivered in the time period 1996-2000 and after level 1 antenatal care was introduced, compared with 54% being delivered in the time period before 1996 and with less meticulous types of antenatal care, remain healthy (p=0.015). CONCLUSION: Triplets are still at high risk for long-term neurodevelopmental complications. Stringent perinatal care might appear important determinant of their long-term outcome.

Birth Weight↗