PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15620622

Interpolation flaps.

Abstract

Interpolation flaps provide an excellent method for reconstruction of large or deep defects where adjacent local tissue cannot supply sufficient donor tissue for repair. These flaps use tissue imported from nonadjacent sites with an inherent blood supply (vascular pedicle) to support the flap while attached to the recipient defect until neovascularization has been ensured between the flap and recipient bed. Hence, they can supply the thickness or bulk needed for large or deep defects and can survive on exposed bone or cartilage. The main disadvantage of these flaps is that they require two stages to complete because the delayed second stage releases the pedicle after inosculation and neovascularization render the tissue independent of the pedicle. This article describes three major interpolation flaps useful in repair of the nose and ear. The forehead, melolabial, and postauricular interpolation flaps are excellent methods that will add to the dermatologic surgeon's reconstructive armamentarium for the repair of large or deep defects.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Ramsey Mellette, Diana Q Ho. 2005. Interpolation flaps.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2004.08.010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Auricular reconstruction.

Reconstruction strategies for the ear should address the major aesthetic goals of maintaining the helical curvature and the symmetric frontal profile. When the auditory canal is involved, maintaining its patency is a major functional goal. The anatomic location of the defect, by virtue of its topographic features and adjacent donor pools, will dictate the appropriate reconstructive option. Familiarity with these anatomically-specific options will enable the surgeon to more simply and effectively reconstruct the ear.

Ear, External↗

Minimally invasive options for cutaneous defects: secondary intention healing, partial closure, and skin grafts.

Several wound management options are available for defects of the head and neck, and choosing the best option requires consideration of several variables. The physical characteristics of the defect, the experience and preferences of the surgeon, and the desires and medicosocial situation of the patient may influence the final reconstructive decision. As the concepts and techniques in the field of reconstructive surgery advance, conservative wound management options should not be overlooked. This article reviews the minimally invasive options for the management of cutaneous defects, including second intention healing, partial closures, and skin grafts. The authors review the basic concepts of wound healing.

Ear, External↗

Anatomy of the jawline, neck, and perioral area with clinical correlations.

The dramatic rise in the number of cosmetic procedures performed during the past 5 years reflects a heightened public awareness of and interest in facial rejuvenation. Concomitant with this rise has been the addition of new injectable fillers, lasers, and minimal incision techniques to the surgeon's armamentarium. Perhaps the greatest applicability of these modalities has been the rejuvenation of the perioral region, neck, and jawline, with reduced "downtime" but visible results. Signs of aging that are clearly visible in the lower third of the face include the loss of elasticity and descent of fat in the jowl region; laxity of the neck skin, muscle, and fat; development of perioral rhytids, deep nasolabial folds, and marionette lines; and the loss of definition of the lips. The purpose of this article is to highlight our approach to rejuvenation of these areas, elucidate the role of newer technologies, and provide special techniques and pearls utilized in rhytidectomy.

Ear, External↗