PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1569234

The propionic acids: a personal perspective.

Abstract

In searching during the early 1950s for new drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, little information was available to allow a rational approach. The mode of action of the few drugs available was unknown and even the analgesic action of aspirin could not be demonstrated in animals. A speculative concept was developed that aspirin possessed a specific unidentified action in rheumatoid arthritis and that this and its analgesic properties were related to its ability to delay the development of ultraviolet (UV) erythema in the guinea pig. A series of substituted phenoxypropionic acids proved to be active as antierythemic agents, but the most potent was inactive clinically in rheumatoid arthritis. Refinements to the testing systems led to a series of substituted phenylacetic acids, three of which although active in rheumatoid arthritis produced unacceptable adverse reactions (ADRs). Attempts to relate laboratory data to clinical ADRs suggested that the substituted phenylpropionic acids (originally rejected because of concerns about toxicity) might be better tolerated than we had anticipated. Ibuprofen was selected from this large group. It was proven to be effective and well tolerated and became "the first of the propionics" when it was launched in 1969. In the 1970s, ibuprofen proved to be effective as a prescription drug in a range of painful nonrheumatic conditions and on the basis of its good safety record was approved as an OTC analgesic in 1983 in the United Kingdom and in 1984 in the USA. It has proven to be popular and effective and much safer than aspirin or acetaminophen in overdosage.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S S Adams. 1992. The propionic acids: a personal perspective.. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1992.tb03842.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Central effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1 alpha on nociceptive thresholds and spontaneous locomotor activity.

To extend the knowledge on the central effects of cytokines, we studied the effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1 alpha on nociceptive thresholds and spontaneous locomotor activity in rats. After central administration, both tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1 alpha significantly (P < 0.001) increase the nociceptive thresholds as measured by the hot-plate test. Tumor necrosis factor alpha, but not interleukin-1 alpha decreases spontaneous locomotor activity evaluated by the Animex test. The increase in nociceptive thresholds induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha or interleukin-1 alpha is not affected by the opiate receptor antagonist naloxone, or antisera against the endogenous opioids beta-endorphin, met-enkephalin or dynorphin. The analgesic effect of tumor necrosis factor alpha is completely antagonized by anti-IL-1 antibodies. Moreover, the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin does not antagonize the increase of nociceptive thresholds induced by either cytokine.

Analgesia

Analgesic effect of salmon-calcitonin administered by two routes. Effect on morphine analgesia.

We compared the analgesia induced by intraperitoneally (i.p.) and intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) administered salmon-calcitonin (S-CT), using the hot-plate test and the writhing test. The influence of the route of administration on the analgesia induced by morphine was also studied. After i.p. administration the analgesic effect was observed only in the writhing test. When S-CT was administered i.c.v., analgesia was observed in both tests, although it was greater in the writhing test than in the hot-plate test. I.c.v. injected S-CT increased the analgesia of i.p. injected morphine. Our results provide new information about the analgesic effect of S-CT and suggest that central mechanisms are involved.

Analgesia

Opioid agonist and antagonist activities of morphindoles related to naltrindole.

A series of naltrindole-related ligands (4-10) with an N-methyl,N-phenethyl,N-cinnamyl, or an unsubstituted basic nitrogen were synthesized and tested for opioid agonist and antagonist activity in smooth muscle preparations and in mice. The nor compounds (4 and 6) and the phenethyl derivatives (5 and 8) displayed full agonist activity (IC50 = 85-179 nM) in the mouse vas deferens preparation (MVD) while the other members of the series exhibited partial agonist or weak antagonist activity. In the guinea pig ileum preparation (GPI), all compounds except 8 were partial agonists. The ligands that were evaluated in mice were found to produce antinociception that was not selectively mediated via delta opioid receptors. However, two of these ligands (4 and 5) appeared to be delta-selective opioid receptor antagonists at subthreshold doses for antinociception. The finding that all of the compounds bind selectively to delta opioid receptors in guinea pig brain membranes together with the in vitro pharmacology and in vivo antagonist studies suggests that the lack of delta agonist selectivity in vivo may be due to a number of factors, including a basic difference between the delta receptor system in the MVD and in the mouse brain. Further, it is suggested that the constellation of message and address components in the morphindole nucleus may tend to stabilize delta receptors in the brain in antagonist state.

Analgesia