PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15711450

Partnering essentials.

Abstract

"The Management Moment" is a regular column within the Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. Janet Porter, PhD, and Edward Baker, MD, MPH, MSc, are serving as The Management Moment Editors. Dr. Porter is Associate Dean for Executive Education, The North Carolina Institute for Public Health, School of Public Health, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Dr. Baker is Director of the North Carolina Institute for Public Health, School of Public Health, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. This column provides commentary and guidance on timely management issues commonly encountered in public health practice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Janet Porter, Edward L Baker. Partnering essentials.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00124784-200503000-00013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities.

The complexity of many urban health problems often makes them ill suited to traditional research approaches and interventions. The resultant frustration, together with community calls for genuine partnership in the research process, has highlighted the importance of an alternative paradigm. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is presented as a promising collaborative approach that combines systematic inquiry, participation, and action to address urban health problems. Following a brief review of its basic tenets and historical roots, key ways in which CBPR adds value to urban health research are introduced and illustrated. Case study examples from diverse international settings are used to illustrate some of the difficult ethical challenges that may arise in the course of CBPR partnership approaches. The concepts of partnership synergy and cultural humility, together with protocols such as Green et al.'s guidelines for appraising CBPR projects, are highlighted as useful tools for urban health researchers seeking to apply this collaborative approach and to deal effectively with the difficult ethical challenges it can present.

Community Health Planning↗

Rural proofing for health: a commentary.

CONTEXT: Health services policies in the UK have traditionally been developed as a 'one size fits all' approach usually based on urban models. This approach can be problematic for primary care agencies involved in the delivery of services in rural and remote areas, due to difficulties with access and also the differences in the nature of urban and rural communities. The Countryside Agency in England has developed a rural proofing framework which will assess the impact that new policies may have in rural areas. This process is currently being applied across all government departments. This article sets out the context of the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK and describes the process of Rural Proofing for Health and how it can be used to improve equity of access to care for people living in rural and remote communities in Britain and across the international healthcare community. ISSUES: There has been a considerable increase in investment in the NHS in recent years with consequent improvements such as reductions in waiting times for treatment. Despite tangible improvements there are still inequalities in health and inequities in healthcare provision, which include parts of the population who live in rural areas. The Rural Proofing for Health project has been developed and carried out by the Institute of Rural Health as a methodology to help Primary Care Organisations implement policies and methods of service delivery that take into account the needs of people living in rural and remote areas. A toolkit has been developed that adopts a solutions-based approach to healthcare delivery in rural areas and which will help people living in rural areas to have equity of access to care with their counterparts living in urban Britain. Rural proofing policies before implementation ensures that the possible impacts of the policy are measured and so that adjustments can be made to ensure that the service will be appropriate for rural communities, and that it can be delivered effectively and efficiently in a rural context. LESSONS: It is important that development of new healthcare policies includes a process that ensures such policies are rurally sensitive. Involving stakeholders at a strategic level ensures that the initiative becomes embedded into policy-making within each department. Rural proofing is a systematic methodology that will help policy makers take account of health needs in rural areas and will hold public bodies accountable to their rural communities.

Community Health Planning↗

Planning and implementing the first stage of an oral health program for the Pika Wiya Health Service Incorporated Aboriginal community in Port Augusta, South Australia.

The oral health of the Indigenous community in South Australia's mid-north has been a concern for some years. There has been a history of under-utilisation of available dental services by the local community. This is in part due to the services not meeting their cultural and holistic health care needs. The Indigenous community resolved to establish a culturally sensitive dental service within the Aboriginal Health Service already operating in Port Augusta in South Australia's mid-north. To achieve this, a partnership between Pika Wiya Health Service Incorporated, the South Australian Dental Service, the University of Adelaide Dental School and the South Australian Centre for Rural and Remote Health was formed. The aim of the project partners was to establish a culturally sensitive, quality dental service that caters to the needs of the Indigenous community serviced by Pika Wiya Health Service Inc. This article describes the process of planning and implementing the first stage of this project.

Community Health Planning↗