PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15716890

Assessing adherence with toothbrushing instructions using a data logger toothbrush.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient compliance with toothbrushing instructions using a data logger and a brushing diary. METHODS: Dental patients were provided with powered toothbrushes modified to carry electronic data loggers. Demonstration of the most effective way to use the toothbrush was provided with instructions to brush for 2 minutes morning and evening. Data logger brushes were supplied for two episodes of 8 weeks. Brushing time was also recorded in a diary during episode 1. RESULTS: Data from 14 brushes (2,287 recordings) were used to evaluate compliance in episode 1 Nine brushes (1,526 recordings) were used in episode 2 A total of 2,333 brushing events were reported manually in the diaries. Data logger records during episode 1 showed that only 34% of events were compliant with the instruction of a 2 minute brushing time, 20% were partially compliant (within +/-30s of 2 minutes), and 46% of events were non-compliant (>30s from 2 minutes). The respective proportions for episode 2 were 24%, 24% and 52%. Diary data reported 58% of events as compliant with 42% non-compliant. CONCLUSIONS: Manually completed brushing diaries do not provide an accurate reflection of subjects' compliance with toothbrushing instructions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G McCracken, J Janssen, L Heasman, F Stacey, N Steen, M deJager, P Heasman. 2005-01-08. Assessing adherence with toothbrushing instructions using a data logger toothbrush.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811954

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗