PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15725221

Stimulation parameter optimization for FES supported standing up and walking in SCI patients.

Abstract

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) to restore leg movement for standing up and walking (stepping) in SCI patients with intact lower motor neuron is used by several groups. Usually quadriceps muscles are stimulated for hip and knee extension, gluteus muscles for hip stabilization, and the common peroneal nerve to elicit the flexion reflex. The requirement to get a natural movement would need a huge number of stimulation channels--a request that could be easily fulfillled from the engineer's point of view but not from the point of practicability since each stimulated muscle requires two skin-attached electrodes resulting in a prolonged time for donning and doffing. In the described project a newly developed eight channel stimulator that can vary the stimulation parameters in many ways and over a wide range is used. The goal is to achieve a natural movement with a minimum of surface electrodes by optimizing the stimulation parameters. Seven experienced FES users and five unexperienced persons (all between Th4-Th11) participate in this study. Standing up can be significantly improved by optimizing the time delay between the onset of quadriceps and gluteus muscles (0.2-0.4 s) and the duration of the ramp. A 0.2 s delay gives good results in heavy patients while slower ramps (0.4 s) are required in slim patients. During stepping, gluteus muscle timing is not very crucial. Gluteus stimulation is turned off 0.1-0.2 s before quadriceps muscle and with the same delay turned on again. Of major influence on the gait quality is the timing during heel strike when peroneal stimulation is switched off and quadriceps stimulation is turned on. Six patients require 0.0-0.1 s where neither peroneal nor quadriceps stimulation is applied, the others require an overlap of 0.1-0.2 s. Activation of adductor muscles during standing up and during the swing phase helps to avoid hip abduction and improves knee trajectories.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Manfred Bijak, Monika Rakos, Christian Hofer, Winfried Mayr, Maria Strohhofer, Doris Raschka, Helmut Kern. 2005. Stimulation parameter optimization for FES supported standing up and walking in SCI patients.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2005.29039.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modeling biological motor control for human locomotion with functional electrical stimulation.

This paper develops a novel control system for functional electrical stimulation (FES) locomotion, which aims to generate normal locomotion for paraplegics via FES. It explores the possibility of applying ideas from biology to engineering. The neural control mechanism of the biological motor system, the central pattern generator, has been adopted in the control system design. Some artificial control techniques such as neural network control, fuzzy logic, control and impedance control are incorporated to refine the control performance. Several types of sensory feedback are integrated to endow this control system with an adaptive ability. A musculoskeletal model with 7 segments and 18 muscles is constructed for the simulation study. Satisfactory simulation results are achieved under this FES control system, which indicates a promising technique for the potential application of FES locomotion in future.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗

Complications and troubleshooting of two-stage sacral neuromodulation therapy: a single-institution experience.

OBJECTIVES: With the increasing use of sacral neuromodulation therapy, urologists are faced with postimplantation challenges. The purpose of this study was to identify these events and their causes and management in our large single-institution experience. METHODS: From July 2002 to September 2004, all patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation therapy for refractory bladder conditions were identified. Their medical records were retrospectively evaluated for history, operative intervention, and programming visits. Events after implantation of the implantable pulse generator (IPG) unit were noted. The evaluation, troubleshooting, management, and resolution of events at the last follow-up visit were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients underwent sacral neuromodulation therapy at our institution. The mean patient age was 53.5 +/- 15.4 years. Of the 214 patients, 161 underwent IPG implantation during a mean follow-up period of 16 months (range 5 to 30). The second-stage explantation and revision rate was 10.5% and 16.1%, respectively. The indications for explantation were infection (8 of 17) and failure to maintain a response (9 of 17). Revisions were done for decreases in response with abnormal (12 of 26) or normal (5 of 26) impedance measurements, IPG site discomfort (4 of 26), draining sinus at the IPG site (4 of 26), and lead migration (1 of 26). Equalization of impedance measurements was the most commonly observed impedance abnormality. These were managed by drying fluid from the connection in 4 patients and lead change in the rest. CONCLUSIONS: After IPG implantation, a decline in response may occur. Although some were explanted, most were revised, with most of the revisions functional on follow-up. Familiarity with impedance evaluation and development of algorithms for postimplant management are essential for troubleshooting and maintenance of the device.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗