PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15744446

[Forearm fractures in children].

Abstract

Fractures of the forearm in children are quite frequent injuries, treated in emergency rooms. Most of them occur during leisure or sport activities. Most cases are monotraumatic. The diagnosis can be made by a conventional x-ray examination of the forearm in two planes. It is possible to differentiate between stable fractures (greenstick fractures) and unstable (dislocated) fractures. The first-line therapy for stable fractures or fractures which can be reduced anatomically correctly, is the conservative procedure using a long arm cast. Axial dislocation up to 20 degrees (age <5 years) or up to 10 degrees (age >5 years) can be accepted. Special cases, such as Monteggia or Galeazzi fractures, must be considered. Unstable fractures have to be reduced during surgical stand-by. The state of the art in surgical therapy is intramedullary nailing with titanium elastic nails. Open fractures and fractures with severe soft tissue injuries can be treated with external fixation. Osteosynthesis with plates should only be used for special indications. By following therapeutic principles, a successful outcome can be achieved and later complications are rare.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Schlickewei, M Oberle. 2005. [Forearm fractures in children].. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-005-0924-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures using an expandable nail.

Interlocking intramedullary nails are the gold standard for treating tibial fractures. We compared the clinical and economic factors associated with tibial fracture fixation using either interlocking intramedullary or expandable nails. From 2000 to 2002, 53 patients with 53 diaphyseal tibial fractures of similar characteristics (AO/OTA 42A1-B3) were randomly and prospectively treated with either interlocking (n = 26) or expandable nails (n = 27). Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. The mean surgical duration was 104 minutes with interlocking nails and 52.9 minutes with expandable nails. Rehospitalizations were required in 12 patients (46%) and reoperations were required in nine patients (35%) with interlocking nails. Only one patient (3%) with an expandable nail required rehospitalization and reoperation. Union was achieved after 17 weeks (mean) with interlocking nails and 11.5 weeks with expandable nails. The beneficial economic ramifications of using expandable nails were a 39% reduction in overall surgical and hospital expenses. Expandable nails showed important clinical advantages for tibial fracture fixation, and complications related to lengthy operations, reoperations, and rehospitalizations were substantially reduced. Overall treatment cost was substantially lower with expandable nails. Based on these advantages, simplicity in use, and short surgical time, we recommend an expandable nail for treating tibial (AO Type A, B) shaft fractures.

Bone Nails↗

Fractured neck of femur in a child after femoral fracture fixation by intramedullary flexible nails: a case report.

Since the introduction of flexible intramedullary nails, the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in adolescents has been revolutionized and this has become the routine treatment in most units, with minimal complications. We report a rare complication of an ipsilateral fractured neck of femur in a fit and healthy 12-year-old girl 6 months after treatment of a traumatic fractured femoral shaft; this was treated effectively with cannulated screws and the patient was successfully discharged without any further complication.

Bone Nails↗