PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15746717

The research grant process: a reference guide for cardiovascular sonographers.

S Michelle Bierig·Patrick Coon·Claudia E Korcarz·Alan D Waggoner
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Opportunities for sonographer-initiated research have increased during the past decade. Although research has traditionally been viewed as a nonclinical activity, funding is available for clinical problems. This article aims to increase sonographer awareness of this unique opportunity, encourage the submission of grant proposals, and enhance the understanding of the grant writing process. This review discusses the procedures involved in planning a research project while describing the structure of the research grant proposal including specific aims, background, preliminary studies, methods, potential limitations, significance, budget, and references.

Explore related subjects

EchocardiographyFinancing, OrganizedInformation ServicesResearch DesignResearch Support as TopicUnited StatesWritingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Michelle Bierig, Patrick Coon, Claudia E Korcarz, Alan D Waggoner. 2005. The research grant process: a reference guide for cardiovascular sonographers.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2004.11.014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Electrocardiographic prediction of left ventricular geometric patterns in patients with essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The present study sought to determine the diagnostic value of electrocardiographic voltage criteria in predicting geometry patterns in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients with essential hypertension (n=125) according to left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness as determined by echocardiography were assigned in the following groups: normal geometry (N, n=50), concentric remodeling (CR, n=12), concentric hypertrophy (CH, n=28) and eccentric hypertrophy (EH, n=35). Each patient underwent 12-lead ECG followed by determination of conventional voltage criteria as well as peak to peak QRS lengths in each lead. RESULTS: Voltage criteria such as Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell, Cornell product >2440, D1R+D3S >25 mm, and AVL R >11 mm could not significantly predict and discriminate geometric patterns of LVH. However, they all were very specific (range 97-100%) and showed very high positive predictive values (range 94-100%) for detecting abnormal geometry. DI peak >12 mm had a sensitivity 61%, specificity 67%, accuracy 63%, positive predictive value 81%, and negative predictive value 42% in predicting to differentiate CH from CR. Sum of the calculated values from the peak of the R to the nadir of the S wave in all limb leads >60 mm had sensitivity 68%, specificity 75%, accuracy 70%, positive predictive value 86% and negative predictive value 50% in predicting to differentiate CH from CR. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional ECG voltage criteria could not significantly discriminate specific geometry patterns observed in patients with essential hypertension.

Echocardiography↗
PubMed2006

Echocardiographic evidence of posteromedial hypokinesis of the left ventricle in relation to mitral regurgitation in cardiac sarcoidosis.

We describe herein the case of a 49-year-old female patient with pulmonary sarcoidosis (stage II) with cardiac manifestation. This consisted of systolic dysfunction without dilatation of the left ventricle and severe mitral insufficiency, possibly due to thinning of the posteromedial left ventricular free wall, based on our echocardiographic observations.

Echocardiography↗