PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15764905

The hygiene hypothesis: does it function worldwide?

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article intends to be a systematic review of papers published during 2003-2004 quoted in a Medline search for 'hygiene hypothesis'. The worldwide perspective of the article does not refer just to a geographical concept, but tries also to address the question of whether the consensus on the hypothesis is global or whether it applies to all types of allergic or immunologic disease, to any age sample or infectious agent. Furthermore, the article outlines those clinical and experimental studies which, in the authors' opinion, may represent significant contributions to a better understanding of the hygiene hypothesis and may guide further investigations on the subject. RECENT FINDINGS: The association between a reduced exposure to infectious agents (as a part of a changed lifestyle) and a higher prevalence of atopy seems now to be confirmed by consistent evidence. Mechanisms underlying this association, however, are not yet completely clear (immune deviation or immune regulation). SUMMARY: Further experimental and clinical studies are needed, with special reference to the time, duration and intensity of exposure to any specific infectious agent which is related to well-defined allergy outcomes. The background information for using microbial products in allergy prevention and treatment is still limited.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Megon Bresciani, Claudio Parisi, Ginevra Menghi, Ginevra Manghi, Sergio Bonini. 2005. The hygiene hypothesis: does it function worldwide?. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.all.0000162307.89857.88

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Natural radioactivity intake into wheat grown on fertilized farms in two districts of Pakistan.

The use of phosphate fertilizers on agricultural farms enhances gamma-ray activity concentration in the farms and therefore absorbed dose rates to the public. The most common natural radionuclides in fertilizer and soil are (40)K, (226)Ra and (232)Th. Agricultural farms at four locations in two districts in Pakistan consisting of saline and normal soils had been under fertilizer treatment for the past 30, 20, 10 and 0 y, therefore, natural radioactivity has been measured in soil samples from these sites to investigate the effect of fertilizers in soil and wheat grown in these sites. Radioactivity measured in soil of the sites under investigation was 550-644, 20-35 and 42-58 Bq kg(-1) for (40)K, (226)Ra and (232)Th, respectively. Wheat was grown in the farms and radioactivity transferred from soil to roots, shoots and grains was also measured. Relatively high natural radioactivity has been observed in the fertilized agricultural farms and in the wheat plants grown in these farms. From the total amount of an element uptaken in a plant, distribution of the element in different parts of the plant has been studied. The distribution of potassium was almost uniform in roots, shoots and grains of wheat; that of radium was different in the three parts of wheat; and that of thorium was almost equal in shoots and grains but quite large in the roots. Soils to grain transfer factors of the natural radionuclides have been determined as 3-4 x 10(-2) for (226)Ra, 2-3 x 10(-2) for (232)Th and 17-20 x 10(-2) for (40)K. Annual doses of (40)K and (226)Ra received by intake of grain products have been estimated to lie within range while the dose received from intake of (232)Th is larger than the range specified in UNSCEAR report 2000.

Environmental Exposure↗