PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15787021

Participatory inquiry with a colleague: an innovative faculty development process.

Abstract

Clinical evaluation is central to the aims of nursing education; however, little has been written about the actual evaluative practices of nurse educators and the sources of influence on those practices. In this article, we describe our experience as co-investigators into the evaluation practices of one of us (J.A.J.) and overview some of the challenges and opportunities of participatory inquiry. We describe how J.A.J.'s involvement in this research project encouraged her to explore her evaluative practices in a meaningful way, which moved her to a place of deeper understanding about her work and transformed her as a nurse educator. As a result of this study, we are convinced of the necessity for a faculty development process whereby colleagues commit to a critical inquiry process focused on identifying each other's evaluative practices and sources of influence on those practices. In addition, schools of nursing can encourage faculty participation in peer development by adopting an expanded view of scholarship in which the disciplined examination of one's evaluative practices is accepted as evidence of the scholarship of teaching.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Star Mahara, Joanne A Jones. 2005. Participatory inquiry with a colleague: an innovative faculty development process.. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20050301-05

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗