PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15850045

A work in progress.

Richard M Zaner
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

After expressing gratitude to each contributor, and briefly commenting on each, I probe several main themes of my work, addressing the question of the apparent difference between my earlier "philosophical" and later "clinical" writings. Central to both is the reflexivity of the human agent, and that each exhibits a form of practice regardless of the specific aims embedded in each. I then address the theme of narrative writing as my work has developed over the past several decades at the heart of which are questions of self and integrity.

Explore related subjects

Ethics ConsultationEthics, ClinicalHumansNarrationBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical ApproachCommentJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Richard M Zaner. 2005. A work in progress.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-004-4807-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

A window into Richard M. Zaner's clinical ethics.

This essay introduces a thematic issue focused on the contributions to clinical ethics and the philosophy of medicine by Richard M. Zaner. We consider the apparent divorce of Zaner's philosophical roots from his recent narrative immersions into the blooming, buzzing confusions of clinical-moral lifeworlds. Our considerations of the Zanerian context and origins of the clinical encounter introduce the fundamental questions faced by Zaner and his commentators in this issue, questions about the role of ethics consultants, moral authority, and clinical truths.

Ethics Consultation↗
PubMed2005

Richard Zaner's "troubled" voice in Troubled Voices: poseur, posing, possibilizing?

This essay considers Richard Zaner's storytelling in Troubled Voices as a form of possibilizing which uses the stories to exemplify important moral themes such as contingency and freedom. Distinguishing between activities of moral discovery through the telling of a story and "posing" in the sense of writing to tell the "moral" of the story, I suggest that something crucial goes on for Zaner in his own tellings. Several of the more insistent implications Zaner reveals about the moral relationships encountered in the activity of clinical ethics consultation are examined in that light, especially regarding this question: is it more beneficial, or harmful, to articulate elements of core meanings and values that are entailed in individual viewpoints, which, prior to an ethics consultant's participation, may have remained unspoken and possibly unacknowledged?

Ethics Consultation↗