PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15860909

Assistive technology outcomes in work settings.

Abstract

Successfully documenting the outcomes of assistive technology (AT) interventions in the workplace benefits people with disabilities, service providers and agencies. However, no work related system currently exists that comprehensively collects the data needed to analyze such outcomes. Part of the reason for this absence of an outcome system is that, while the concept is simple, the process is complex and depends on the acquisition of data that represent many outcomes related variables. This article describes the exploratory work of the NIDRR (National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research) funded ATOMS Project (Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System) and its efforts to identify existing data that might be used as the basis for an outcomes measurement system. Sample records from four assistive technology service programs were acquired and evaluated for the data they housed. This study discovered that AT service programs fail to collect consistent or sufficient data for outcomes analysis. However, discussions with AT programs that provided services to State vocational rehabilitation agencies revealed an interesting potential. Assistive technology service data in combination with data collected by State vocational rehabilitation departments might coalesce the needed data. The Federal Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) 911 Report aggregates many variables of outcomes related information including employment status and the success of the vocational rehabilitation investment. This combined database could answer a range of assistive technology outcomes related questions of interest to service providers, people with disabilities, and vocational rehabilitation State agencies. This paper describes the data needed in an outcomes system, reviews the data that appear to be available today related to AT outcomes, and projects how data from two diverse programs might be used together to create a significant outcomes database.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Todd D Schwanke, Roger O Smith. 2005. Assistive technology outcomes in work settings.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15860909/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Cognition on demand?--The wish for cognition-enhancing drugs in medicine].

DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM: Due to recent advances in psychopharmacology, a large variety of drugs can be offered that intend to improve one's mood, memory and executive functions. These offers seem to meet the wishes and needs of people striving for enhancement of their mental capacities. How should medicine deal with these wishes? And, especially, what criteria might serve a physician's decision-making? ARGUMENTS: As shown in the following, this decision-making process cannot be convincingly informed by criteria drawing on the distinction between 'enhancement' and 'treatment' or on certain concepts of disease, normality or medicine. Instead, a decision-making model will be developed which builds on the traditional criteria of a physician's practice: the criteria of benevolence, non-maleficence, and autonomy. CONCLUSION: By means of this model, a new concept of "medicine-on-demand" will be suggested: a subjective medicine with a physician's recommendation and veto right.

Biomedical Enhancement↗