PubMed · 15891785
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Aldo Carano, Birte Melsen. 2005. Implants in orthodontics. Interview.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15891785/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Thoracoplasty in combination with spine fusion is an established method to address the rib cage deformity in idiopathic scoliosis. Most reports about thoracoplasty and scoliosis correction focused on Harrington or CD instrumentation. We report a retrospective analysis of 21 consecutive patients, who were treated with pedicle screw instrumentation for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis and concomitant thoracoplasty. Minimal follow up was 24 (24-75) months. Indication for thoracoplasty was clinical rib prominence of more than 15 degrees . In average there was a 44% correction of clinical rib hump, from 18 (15-25 degrees ) to 10 degrees (0-18 degrees ) (p<0.0001) and a 40% correction of radiological rib hump, from 15 (5-20 degrees ) to 9 degrees (2-15 degrees ) (p<0.0001). The preoperative pulmonary function, accessed by forced vital capacity (FVC) and one-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), remained unchanged at the last follow up. The distal end of fusion was the end vertebra of the curve in 83.3% and the end vertebra plus one in 16.7% of the patients. There was a 68% correction of instrumented primary thoracic curves, from 60 (45-85 degrees ) to 19 degrees (5-36 degrees ) (p<0.0001), and a 45% correction of non-instrumented secondary lumbar curves, from 40 (28-60 degrees ) to 22 degrees (8-38 degrees ) (p<0.0001). Apical vertebral rotation (AVR) of the thoracic curves improved 54%, from 24 (10-35 degrees ) to 11 degrees (5-20 degrees ) (p<0.0001). The tilt of lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) improved 68%, from 28 (20-42 degrees ) to 9 degrees (3-20 degrees ) (p<0.0001). There was no significant change in sagittal profile of the spine. Analysis with SRS-24 questionnaire showed that the majority of the patients were very satisfied with the outcome. A matched control group (n=21) operated by the same surgeon with the same operation technique but without concomitant thoracoplasty was chosen for comparison. The scoliosis correction in the two groups was comparable. The patients without thoracoplasty had 37% spontaneous improvement of the clinical rib hump.
Currently there are few data available regarding the application and efficacy of computer-assisted procedures in the sacral spine. In order to optimize and standardize this procedure, a controlled experimental investigation has been performed. The aim of the study is to systematically assess the efficacy of a novel three-dimensional image intensifier used for navigated transiliac screw insertion into the first sacral vertebra. Screws were inserted iliosacrally into the first sacral vertebra of preserved human cadaver specimens. The instrument navigated procedure was performed with the "Siremobil Iso-C(3D) " (Siemens Medical Solutions) and the "Navigation System" by Stryker. The accuracy and quality of the imaging procedure as well as the fluoroscopic exposure times were measured. These results were compared to three control groups (CT-based navigation, C-arm navigation, and fluoroscopic guidance). In each group a total amount of 20 screws was implanted. Screw position was postoperatively assessed by Iso-C(3D) or CT-scan. The navigated procedure using the Iso-C(3D) provided good feasibility characteristics without requiring a specific matching process. It revealed the shortest procedure time of all navigated procedures and significantly decreased fluoroscopic time compared to C-arm navigation and fluoroscopic guidance. Furthermore, Iso-C(3D) navigation showed no screw malposition and was in this regard superior to C-arm navigated and fluoroscopic guided procedures. The quality of imaging was sufficient for accurate placement, but did not share the high-resolution level of CT-based navigation. These findings indicate that application of the Iso-C(3D) for navigated transiliac screw insertion into S1 can be recommended as a feasible and safe technique, enabling the surgeon to reduce procedure and fluoroscopic time. Further progress in improving the quality of the Iso-C(3D) image should be attempted.
STUDY DESIGN: A cadaveric study comparing image guidance technology to fluoroscopic guidance as a means of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine, using a unique starting point for screw placement. OBJECTIVE: To assess accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement using image guidance versus fluoroscopic guidance for screw insertion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While use of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine has been increasing, its adoption has been slower than for the lumbar spine, reflecting concern regarding possible vascular or spinal cord injury due to screw malplacement. Given these risks, efforts to improve the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement remain appropriate. Stereotactic guidance has been applied in other aspects of spinal surgery to improve the accuracy of instrumentation placement. METHODS: Pedicle screws were placed in the thoracic spines of eight cadavers, using either a stereotactic guidance or a manual, fluoroscopically guided technique. A slightly more superior and lateral starting point from prior descriptions was used. Each cadaver was instrumented with pedicle screws in the upper thoracic (T1-T2), middle thoracic (T4-T7), and lower thoracic (T9-T10) regions. In the upper and middle thoracic regions, screws with a 4.0-mm shank diameter were used while in the lower thoracic region a shank diameter of 4.5 mm was used. Postinstrumentation CT scans, followed by anatomic dissections, were used to evaluate screw exit rates and orientation relative to the pedicle axis. Exit rates for the two techniques and the effect of vertebral level on exit rate were compared using a chi analysis. The effect of pedicle diameter was tested using a Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: No significant differences in the overall exit rates or orientation were found between the two techniques. There were significant differences in exit rates between the middle (47%), compared with the upper (9%) and lower (16%) thoracic regions, respectively (P < 0.001). A significant correlation between pedicle diameter and exit rate was also found (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study showed no significant differences in the overall exit rates between the two techniques. Image guidance may increase confidence of surgeons with limited experience in thoracic pedicle screw placement. Successful placement of screws within the pedicle varies with the anatomic diameter of the pedicle itself. Concerns regarding accuracy of screw placement should be greatest in the middle thoracic vertebrae (T4-T7), where pedicle diameters are smallest and proximity of the great vessels is nearest.