PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15933120

Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.

P Doyle·C J Martin·D Gentle
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A range of techniques has been developed in conventional radiography for the chest, because of technical difficulties in imaging the wide variation of tissue densities. These techniques can differ significantly in tube potential selection, for scatter reduction and in application of manual or automatic exposure control. In this study a geometric chest phantom designed to simulate a chest image, has been used to study image quality on an indirect digital radiography (DR) system. Relative values for the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), have been derived from analysis of contrast detail objects within the lung, heart and subdiaphragm regions of the phantom. Results showing the variation in SNR and detail perception with tube potential are presented for three radiographic techniques: using a grid, an air gap and no scatter reduction. SNR measurements provided a useful objective measure for assessment of image quality for optimising DR systems.

Explore related subjects

ArtifactsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungModels, TheoreticalPhantoms, ImagingRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiographyRadiography, ThoracicRadiometryScattering, RadiationTechnology, RadiologicX-Ray FilmX-Ray Intensifying ScreensJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Doyle, C J Martin, D Gentle. 2005. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd%2Fnch546

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2008

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗