PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15939334

Complex molecules: do they add value?

Abstract

The concept of complexity in chemistry has received much interest in the research community. Various measures to assess molecular complexity have been published, ranging from abstract complexity definitions to very specific application-oriented definitions. In this article we focus on molecular complexity in relation to biological activity. Connectivity and feature-based structural descriptors have been evaluated with reference to their potential as complexity measures. Our goal was to discuss the potential of the complexity concept to support the drug discovery process, helping to design suitable lead candidates. The studies have shown that highly active compounds, on average, are more complex than inactive compounds. However, complexity must be balanced with other molecular properties because more complex molecules have a higher probability to exhibit pharmacokinetic problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Paul Selzer, Hans-Jörg Roth, Peter Ertl, Ansgar Schuffenhauer. 2005. Complex molecules: do they add value?. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.04.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Chemical genetics: an evolving toolbox for target identification and lead optimization.

Chemical genetics combines chemistry with biology as a means of exploring the function of unknown proteins or identifying the proteins responsible for a particular phenotype. Chemical genetics is thus a valuable tool in the identification of novel drug targets. This chapter describes the application of chemical genetics in traditional and systems-based approaches to drug target discovery and the tools/approaches that appear most promising for guiding future pharmaceutical development.

Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques↗

Protein library design and screening: working out the probabilities.

In designing protein libraries for selection, we must coordinate our capacity to create a large diversity of protein variants with the physical limitations of what we can actually screen. This chapter aims to bring the language of probabilities into the protein engineer's laboratory to answer some of our common questions: How can we most efficiently design a library? What fraction of the theoretical library diversity have we actually sampled at the end of the day? What is the probability of missing an individual of the library? Are the mutations present in the variants we have selected statistically meaningful or the product of random variation? The computation of these criteria throughout the process of experimental protein engineering will enable us to better design and evaluate the products of our libraries of protein variants.

Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques↗

Computationally designed libraries of fluorescent proteins evaluated by preservation and diversity of function.

To determine which of seven library design algorithms best introduces new protein function without destroying it altogether, seven combinatorial libraries of green fluorescent protein variants were designed and synthesized. Each was evaluated by distributions of emission intensity and color compiled from measurements made in vivo. Additional comparisons were made with a library constructed by error-prone PCR. Among the designed libraries, fluorescent function was preserved for the greatest fraction of samples in a library designed by using a structure-based computational method developed and described here. A trend was observed toward greater diversity of color in designed libraries that better preserved fluorescence. Contrary to trends observed among libraries constructed by error-prone PCR, preservation of function was observed to increase with a library's average mutation level among the four libraries designed with structure-based computational methods.

Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques↗