PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15972177

Vascular occlusion to decrease blood loss during hepatic resection.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Historically, the primary hazard with liver surgery has been intraoperative blood loss. This led to the refinement of inflow and outflow occlusive techniques. The utility of the different methods of inflow and outflow techniques for hepatic surgery were reviewed. METHODS: A search of the English literature (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Cochrane clinical trials registry, hand searches, and bibliographic reviews) using the terms "liver," "hepatic," "Pringle," "total vascular exclusion," "ischemia," "reperfusion," "inflow," and "outflow occlusion" was performed. RESULTS: A multitude of techniques to minimize blood loss during hepatic resection have been studied. The evidence suggests that inflow occlusion techniques are generally well tolerated. These should be used with caution in patients with cirrhosis, fibrosis, steatosis, cholestasis, and recent chemotherapy, and for prolonged time intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Harmful effects of intraoperative blood loss and transfusion occur during hepatic resection. Portal triad clamping (PTC) is associated with less blood loss compared with no clamping. In procedures with ischemic times <1 hour in length, PTC-C (continuous) is likely equal to PTC-I (intermittent). In patients with chronic liver disease or undergoing lengthy operations, PTC-I is likely superior to PTC-C. PTC is superior to total vascular exclusion except in patients with tumors that are large and deep seated, hypervascular, and/or abutting the hepatic veins or vena cava and in patients with increased right-sided heart pressures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Elijah Dixon, Charles M Vollmer, Oliver F Bathe, Francis Sutherland. 2005. Vascular occlusion to decrease blood loss during hepatic resection.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.10.007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches to ileal pouch surgery.

AIMS: The present meta-analysis compared short-term outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: A literature search of Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Ovid, Excerpta Medica and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies published between 1990 and 2006 comparing laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy. A random-effect meta-analytical technique was used, and sensitivity analysis was performed on studies published since 2001, higher-quality papers, those reporting on more than 30 patients and those with matching of patient characteristics. RESULTS: Ten studies satisfied the selection criteria, including outcomes on 329 patients, 168 (51.1%) of whom underwent laparoscopic resection. Operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group by 86 min (p<0.001) and throughout the subgroup analysis, but this finding was associated with significant heterogeneity. Operative blood loss was less in the laparoscopic group by 84 ml. There was no significant difference in post-operative adverse events between the groups. A statistically significant reduction in length of post-operative stay was observed for laparoscopic patients in high-quality studies and those reporting on more than 30 patients by 1.1 days (p=0.02 in both subgroups) and studies published in or since 2001 by 3.0 days (p=0.004) but not overall. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ileal pouch surgery was associated with longer operative time, lower blood loss, shorter length of hospital stay and similar short-term adverse events compared with open surgery. Comparative data on quality of life and long-term outcomes are currently unavailable. The potential advantage of laparoscopic ileal pouch surgery remains to be established.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic oesophagectomy improves the quality of extended lymphadenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy carries considerable morbidity due to parietal trauma. It is also technically extremely demanding because the difficult access even through a large thoracotomy requires the use of long instruments to reach the deepest recess in the chest cavity. Since the first thoracoscopic oesophagectomy reported by Cuschieri et al. [1] in 1992, different minimally invasive approaches have been proposed [2-12]. The aim of this video is to show the accurate and relative ease of an entirely thoracoscopic and laparoscopic oesophagectomy with an extended lymph node dissection of mediastinum in prone position (thoracoscopically) and celiac trunk (laparoscopically). METHODS: Oesophagectomy by thoracoscopy, laparoscopy and cervicotomy was proposed in a 63-year-old man with a lower third oesophageal cancer. General anaesthesia was performed with a double-lumen endotracheal tube and the patient was placed in prone position. Surgeons were positioned at the right side of the patient. Only three trocars were needed. A 10 mm 30-degree angled scope was inserted in the 7th intercostal space on the posterior axillary line and the remaining two 5 mm trocars were inserted in the 5th and 9th intercostal spaces on the posterior axillary line. Prone position allows an excellent visibility of the operative field even in an only partially deflated lung. In order to achieve a good exposure, transitory pneumothorax with CO2 (14 mmHg) was performed. The mediastinal pleura overlying the oesophagus was incised and the arch of azygos vein was isolated, ligated and divided. The oesophagus was circumferentially mobilized from the thoracic inlet down to oesophageal hiatus. Para oesophageal and subcarinal lymph nodes were dissected so as to remain in block with the surgical specimen. A 28 F chest tube was inserted in the 8th intercostal space on the anterior axillary line. In the second stage the patient was placed in supine position and pneumoperitoneum was established. Five trocars were placed along an ideal semicircular line, with the concavity facing the subcostal margin and a 30-degree angled laparoscope was used. The lesser omentum was widely opened up the right pillar of the hiatus. Mobilization of the greater curvature of the stomach was performed preserving the right gastroepiploic artery. A wide Kocher maneuver was performed. Celiac lymphadenectomy started with skeletonization of the hepatic artery until the root of left gastric artery was reached. This artery and the left gastric vein were dissected, clipped and sectioned. All fatty tissue and lymph nodes along hepatic artery, left gastric artery and celiac trunk were resected in block with the surgical specimen. Multiple applications of a linear endoscopic stapler were used to create the gastric tube. Finally the distal oesophagus was dissected, until the thoracoscopic dissection field was joined. In the third stage a left lateral cervicotomy was performed and the cervical oesophagus was dissected down to the thoracoscopic dissection plane. Oesophagus and stomach were delivered through the cervical incision and an oesophagogastric anastomosis was created by a linear stapler technique. Cervical and abdominal drainages were installed. RESULTS: The total operative time was 271 minutes (thoracoscopy: 106 minutes, laparoscopy 120 minutes and cervicotomy 45 minutes) and blood loss was about 100 ml. Histological examination demonstrated a squamous cell carcinoma. Both margins of resection were free of tumour and 29 lymph nodes were retrieved. The final stage was IIA (pT3N0Mx). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic oesophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy is technically feasible and safe. Thoracoscopic oesophagectomy in prone position improves the quality of dissection because: The oesophagus and aorto-pulmonary window are reached under excellent visibility, despite a partially deflated lung, which because of gravity will always remain out of harm's way. For the same reason small to moderate bleeding will not obscure the operative field. Dissection with the long endoscopic instruments is more accurate due to the support provided by the entrance site at the parietal level and the ergonomic position of surgeon. This article contains a supplementary video.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗