PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15973201

[Computer-assisted diagnosis and therapy for glaucoma].

Abstract

Boolean algebra, or combinatory analysis and their related computer routines, can provide invaluable help in resolving classic diagnostic problems. However complex each case may be, the diagnosis is always made from a finite set of data, and the fundamental problem is thus how to exploit this data. Invention no longer has a place in ascertaining a diagnosis. Traditional ways of reasoning are numerous, personal, and fragile, but fortunately redundant. They may give rise to four types of error: omission or mistake (an error of judgment), either during the semiotic or the dialectic stages. Whereas the physiological capacity of the human brain and memory only enables it to make a limited number of hypotheses concerning certain aspects of glaucoma, computer programs can take the total number of hypotheses into account, i.e., 3000. For every input the program explores each of the 3,000 items, thus eliminating the four types of error. The probabilistic nature of data, which compromises the confidence one can have in conclusions resulting from such complex reasoning, is treated by the adjusted probabilities. The use of such diagnostic aids, whose thesaurus is updated regularly, is reserved for ophthalmologists, the only authority capable of assessing the pertinence of the computer responses. Consequently, the specialist can rest assured that the patient has benefited from the most comprehensive and updated knowledge in medical science.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Paycha, G Nepoux, O Roche, P Dureau, Y Uteza, J-L Dufier. 2005. [Computer-assisted diagnosis and therapy for glaucoma].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0181-5512(05)81071-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Do scleral flap dimensions influence reliability of intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy?

AIM: To compare the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of large vs small scleral flap size during trabeculectomy using adjustable sutures. METHODS: Trabeculectomy operations were performed on nine donor human eyes connected to a constant flow infusion with real-time IOP monitoring. Large scleral flaps (4 x 4 mm, 16 mm(2), n=12) or small scleral flaps (3 x 2 mm, 6 mm(2), n=9) were constructed over 0.76 mm(2) sclerostomies. For each procedure, equilibrium IOP was measured following tight closure with two four-throw adjustable 10-0 nylon sutures. RESULTS: Five scleral flaps were thin or poorly constructed; four of these were in the initial seven procedures, implying learning effect. These had a mean absolute IOP of 7.6 mmHg (range 2.7-12.4 mmHg) and mean relative IOP of 28.3% of baseline (range 10-45.8%) after closure. In the remaining 16 good quality procedures, mean IOP was 1.3 mmHg (range 0-3.4 mmHg) after sclerostomy, confirming minimal outflow resistance before closure. Following flap closure mean IOP was 20 mmHg (SD 4.4, range 15.5-29.3 mmHg) for large (n=8), and 18.7 mmHg (SD 3.6, 15.9-25.8 mmHg) for small (n=8) flaps (unpaired t-test, P=0.26). Mean IOP (% baseline) was 71.6% (SD 8.4, range 60.6-86.6%) and 66% (SD=12.7, 46.8-86.6%) for large and small flap groups, respectively (unpaired t-test, P=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Well-constructed scleral flaps of both sizes were able to support an average IOP at least two-thirds of baseline, and both had similar absolute IOP levels. Errors in flap construction resulted in loss of IOP control. Smaller flap size does not appear to compromise control of early postoperative IOP using adjustable sutures.

Glaucoma↗