PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15990942

Sedation during colonoscopy.

Abstract

In order to perform a proper screening for colonic cancer, repeated colonoscopies are required. Comfort during colonoscopy is very important, so that the patient will accept repeated procedures. Currently, there are 3 types of sedation used during colonoscopy: general anesthesia performed by an anesthesiologist; sedo-analgesia performed by an anesthesiologist or by a gastroenterologist; sedo-analgesia performed by a trained nurse. Sedo-analgesia is the most frequently used type of sedation during colonoscopy worldwide. It is realized by combining midazolam with propofol and/or fentanyl (alfentanyl) or pethidine. According to the data obtained from 34 centers performing colonoscopy in Romania, in 2003, 22,162 colonoscopies were performed: 54.5% without anesthesia, 39.5% with sedation with midazolam and 6% with sedo-analgesia. In a study performed in our department we noticed a significant improvement in the outcome of the colonoscopy when sedo-analgesia was used on a regular basis. The percentage of total colonoscopies (excluding those that could not be continued due to stenosis) was 84.2% when sedation was seldomly performed and 92.3% when sedo-analgesia was regularly used (p=0.042). We believe that the strategy of sedation during colonoscopy in Romania should be changed so that all the patients should benefit from sedo-analgesia, proved to be safe and cost/efficient.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ioan Sporea, Alina Popescu, Dorel Sandesc, Chadi Abou Salha, Roxana Sirli, Mirela Danila. 2005. Sedation during colonoscopy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15990942/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparative Efficacy of Different AI Systems for Polyp Detection by Size During Colonoscopy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains a leading cause of death despite being largely preventable through polypectomy. AI systems designed to enhance polyp detection during colonoscopy have shown promise, but the extent to which they improve detection of different-sized polyps remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the size-stratified efficacy of AI-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) method, and generated exploratory rankings while acknowledging all cross-platform comparisons are indirect. METHODS: This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science from inception to July 25, 2026, supplemented by citation searching. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AI-assisted vs standard colonoscopy in adults (≥18 years of age), reporting mean polyp detection counts stratified by size (≤5 mm, 6-9 mm, and ≥10 mm). Two reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0. We conducted frequentist NMA using the HKSJ method with restricted maximum likelihood estimation, calculated 95% prediction intervals (PIs), and assessed heterogeneity using I2 and τ2. Certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework. RESULTS: A total of 13 RCTs (4156 participants) compared 8 AI systems to standard colonoscopy, forming a network without direct AI comparisons. For diminutive polyps (≤5 mm), AI showed a modest advantage (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.35, 95% PI -1.12 to 1.54), but substantial heterogeneity (I2=86.6%) and wide PI crossing the null indicated high uncertainty. EndoScreener showed the most consistent evidence (SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.54). For small and large polyps, effects were minimal (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.06, 95% PI -0.03 to 0.07; SMD 0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.02, 95% PI -0.01 to 0.03). GRADE certainty was very low for diminutive polyps and low for small and large polyps. Sensitivity analysis excluding Tianjin YuJin did not materially change findings. CONCLUSIONS: AI may modestly enhance diminutive polyp detection, but effects on small and large polyps are minimal, with no platform superiority. Given very low to low certainty, findings are hypothesis-generating. This exploratory NMA provides size-stratified comparisons that can inform future head-to-head trial design. Unlike prior reviews aggregating all polyp sizes, we show the overall AI benefit is driven by diminutive polyp detection, providing a framework for targeted deployment-prioritizing AI for diminutive polyp screening, with limited value for larger lesions. Head-to-head trials are urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD420251266932; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251266932.

Colonoscopy↗

Optical adjuncts for enhanced colonoscopic diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Optical techniques using previously unexploited properties of light interaction with tissue may be valuable in the detection, diagnosis and staging of colorectal neoplasia. METHODS: A Medline search (1990 to present) was conducted on optical diagnostics in the detection of colorectal neoplasia. The reference list of each identified article was reviewed for further relevant papers. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Chromoendoscopy is the only optical adjunct to colonoscopy that has been tested in large randomized clinical trials. It improves the detection of small and flat colorectal adenomas, and of neoplasia in chronic ulcerative colitis and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. All other techniques are the subject of ongoing research and the practicality of population screening with any of the methods has yet to be established. Optical techniques may, however, permit immediate clinical diagnosis, removing the need for histological analysis. They may also improve the diagnosis of early colonic neoplasia.

Colonoscopy↗

Fragile egos.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Colonoscopy↗