PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16032916

From pedestal to possibility: learning scholarly writing using a unique course assignment.

Yolanda Griffiths·Brenda Coppard·Helene Lohman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Can the experience of interviewing published authors and reflection help developing health care professionals learn about scholarly writing? Students were asked to interview published authors by phone and in person, asking a set of six interview questions designed to give insight into the authors' writing process. Students' reflective assignments based on such interviews were then analyzed. Students identified particular rituals and routines that certain authors used to promote their writing ability, as well as the struggles authors face and their strategies to overcome these problems. After the course assignment, students viewed published authors more realistically as individuals who learned to write in a scholarly manner through experience and skill development. This course assignment is an innovative pedagogical approach to help students understand the process of writing in a scholarly manner and to encourage the professional dissemination of information via scholarly publications.

Explore related subjects

Allied Health PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicLearningWritingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yolanda Griffiths, Brenda Coppard, Helene Lohman. 2005. From pedestal to possibility: learning scholarly writing using a unique course assignment.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16032916/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Children unable to perform screening tests in vision in preschoolers study: proportion with ocular conditions and impact on measures of test accuracy.

PURPOSE: To examine the relative prevalence of ocular conditions among children who are unable to perform preschool vision screening tests and the impact on measures of screening test performance. METHODS: Trained nurse and lay screeners each administered a Lea Symbols visual acuity (VA) test (Good-Lite, Inc., Steamwood, IL), Stereo Smile II test (Stereo Optical, Inc., Chicago, IL), and Retinomax Autorefractor (Right Manufacturing, Virginia Beach, VA), and SureSight Vision Screener (Welch Allyn, Inc., Skaneateles Falls, NY) examinations to 1475 children who later received a comprehensive eye examination to identify amblyopia, strabismus, significant refractive error, and unexplained reduced VA. The outcomes of the examination for children for whom screeners were unable to obtain results (Unables) were compared to the outcomes of children who passed and children who failed each screening test. When estimating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), Unables were classified as either screening failures or screening passers. RESULTS: Less than 2% of children were classified as Unables for each test. The percentage with an ocular condition was at least two times higher for Unables than for screening passers for six of the eight modes of screening (P < 0.05). Considering Unables as screening failures, rather than screening passers, increased the estimate of sensitivity by 1% to 3% (depending on test) and decreased the estimate of specificity by 0% to 2%; PPV decreased by 0% to 4% for most tests, whereas NPV increased by <1%. CONCLUSIONS: Preschool children who are unable to perform VIP screening tests are more likely to have vision disorders than are children who pass the tests. Because < or =2% of children were unable to do each test, referring these children for an eye examination had little impact on the PPV and NPV of the tests, as administered in VIP.

Allied Health Personnel↗
PubMed2006

Running before we walk: how can we maximise the benefits from community service dietitians in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa?

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The Department of Health in South Africa, instituted compulsory community service (CS) as one strategy to overcome the chronic shortage of health professionals in underserved and rural areas. A number of articles have listed the reasons for the lack of willingness of health professionals to practice in rural areas. Amongst others they listed the lack of career opportunities, the recruitment of students into health professions from incongruous backgrounds, inappropriate training, bureaucratic problems, poorly equipped hospitals and social isolation. The aim of this study was to examine and explore the factors affecting the professional development of dietitians during CS. METHODS: Thirteen of the 15 community service dietitians (CSDs) currently (2005) undertaking CS in KwaZulu-Natal participated in focus group discussions. Each member of the group was also required to answer a short written questionnaire before the discussions to establish whether there was congruence between the written answers and the verbal discussions. The large group was divided into two sub groups and each session lasted one and a half hours. A list of topics was discussed by each group. The sessions were taped and transcribed and further analysed using the qualitative analysis programme, "QSR NVivo". RESULTS: Analysis of the transcripts revealed a number of thematic areas and included the evaluation of the placement process, obstructions and constraints, the developmental progress of the CSD and means of enhancing professional development. The discussion on the placement process was not contentious, with only three CSDs having reservations about the process. Many obstructions and constraints to service delivery and professional development were revealed and included the lack of supervision and support, the lack of preparedness of the institutions receiving CSDs and the lack of clarity of the CSDs' perception of community service, unhappiness of some CSDs being placed a long way from home, work and role overload, not being part of a team, lack of understanding the CSDs role and the under utilisation of their services. Developmental progress of the CSDs was enhanced by some positive aspects which included the social interactions experienced in the community setting, learning new skills and support that they received from other community service professionals. DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Comparison of the written answers with verbal discussions showed the same results. A number of issues raised in this study have been recorded by other authors. It is recommended that the issue of supervision and support be addressed so that the professional development of CSDs is enhanced. The lack of preparedness of the receiving institutions is a problem that is relatively easy to address and should be made a priority. The training institutions also need to be more proactive in preparing dietetic students for CS. CONCLUSIONS: Compulsory community service as a method of addressing the problems of underserved population has merit. To maximise the benefits the DOH would do well to heed the recommendations by ensuring that there are structures in place to provide adequate resources for and support and supervision of CSDs.

Allied Health Personnel↗