PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16114608

Using technology to improve and support communication and workflow processes.

Deborah Tuke Bahlman·Fay C Johnson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In conjunction with a large expansion project, a team of perioperative staff members reviewed their workflow processes and designed their ideal patient tracking and communication system. Technologies selected and deployed included a passive infrared tracking system, an enhanced nurse call system, wireless telephones, and a web-based electronic grease board. The new system provides staff members with an easy way to obtain critical pieces of patient information, as well as track the progress of patients and locate equipment.

Explore related subjects

Computer Communication NetworksHumansNursing InformaticsOperating Room Information SystemsOperating RoomsOregonPatient Identification SystemsPerioperative NursingQuality of Health CareSurgery Department, HospitalSurgical Procedures, OperativeTechnologyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Deborah Tuke Bahlman, Fay C Johnson. 2005. Using technology to improve and support communication and workflow processes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)60301-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

The clinical document architecture and the continuity of care record: a critical analysis.

Health care provides many opportunities in which the sharing of data between independent sites is highly desirable. Several standards are required to produce the functional and semantic interoperability necessary to support the exchange of such data: a common reference information model, a common set of data elements, a common terminology, common data structures, and a common transport standard. This paper addresses one component of that set of standards: the ability to create a document that supports the exchange of structured data components. Unfortunately, two different standards development organizations have produced similar standards for that purpose based on different information models: Health Level 7 (HL7)'s Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) and The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International) Continuity of Care Record (CCR). The coexistence of both standards might require mapping from one standard to the other, which could be accompanied by a loss of information and functionality. This paper examines and compares the two standards, emphasizes the strengths and weaknesses of each, and proposes a strategy of harmonization to enhance future progress. While some of the authors are members of HL7 and/or ASTM International, the authors stress that the viewpoints represented in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the official viewpoints of either HL7 or of ASTM International.

Computer Communication Networks↗