PubMed · 16148509
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Marcus J Schultz. 2005. Still puzzled by additional data from the PROWESS study.. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000179027.22630.78
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is a rapidly evolving field. It has been adopted at many institutions worldwide. This review compares the efficacy and cost of catheter ablation and medical therapy in atrial fibrillation patients. RECENT FINDINGS: There is emerging evidence for clinical superiority of catheter ablation over medical therapy for restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation patients. Early analyses of costs related to catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation suggest that medical therapy and catheter ablation become cost-equivalent at about 5 years of follow-up. A recent cost-effectiveness study concluded that catheter ablation is a cost-effective alternative to medical care in younger and older patients at low and moderate risk of stroke, assuming that restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm with ablation would have some protective effect with respect to embolic events. SUMMARY: Catheter ablation is a potentially cost-effective strategy in select patients with atrial fibrillation. Long-term randomized studies that compare it to conventional care and focus on outcomes of morbidity and mortality are necessary prior to widespread application of this technique.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the UK. Studies have shown that pulmonary embolism causes or contributes to approximately 1 in 10 hospital deaths of medical patients admitted to general hospitals in the UK (Lindblad B, Sternby NH, Bergqvist D. BMJ 1991; 302: 709-11), with pulmonary embolus being the most common preventable cause of hospital death. Thromboprophylaxis is safe, highly effective and cost effective, but despite various current clinical guidelines, physicians fail to prescribe prophylaxis for the majority of medical inpatients at risk of VTE. This article outlines the current evidence for VTE prophylaxis in medical patients and discusses the reasons behind the insufficient use of prophylaxis in the acute medical setting.
The anticoagulant effect of enoxaparin is readily observed by Thrombelastography (TEG), particularly on the reaction time (R) to form a clot, and is completely reversed by heparinase. In this study, recalcified citrated whole blood with heparinase (CNHR) and without (CNR), along with TEG R time, was used to derive a delta R (CNR-CNHR). This delta R (DeltaR) was then used to measure enoxaparin anticoagulation, which was correlated by linear regression (r(2)=0.806) with plasma anti-Xa in 48 thrombophilic pregnancy patients. In a follow up study whole blood from 15 thrombophilic and 15 normal pregnancy subjects was titrated ex vivo with enoxaparin and TEG DeltaR determined. Linear dose responses (all r(2)>0.9) of DeltaR versus plasma enoxaparin concentration were obtained for each subject. A large variation in slope was observed for both thrombophilic (>7 fold, 217 to 1,588 s DeltaR/unit anti-Xa) and normal (>3 fold, 788 to 2,758) pregnancy subjects. The average slope for the thrombophilic group (710 s DeltaR/unit anti-Xa) was significantly (P=0.002) lower than the normal pregnancy group (1,354 s), indicating resistance to enoxaparin anticoagulation in the thrombophilic group. This technique may help gauge the appropriate dose of enoxaparin for each individual, check for residual anticoagulation before invasive procedures, and perhaps help screen for thrombophilic subjects.