PubMed · 16189409
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Lynne A Thomas. Endoscope precleaning.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001610-200507000-00008
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is characterized by single-handed preparation and guidance of the endoscope by the nondominant hand. This results in an additional extension of operation time by up to 15% and ergonomic deficits. The aim of this study is the conception of an automated assistance system for FESS in view of the following questions: (1) Which degree of surgical automation is suitable for FESS? (2) Which design is suitable? (3) What are the properties of the technical system (planning, time, accuracy, precision) of the selected system? (4) Does the system offer potential for a clinical application? METHODS: In all 49 FESS were analyzed for surgical workflows. Measurement of the maximum forces within FESS was performed with 40 trials on an anatomical model. Three different mechanical systems were used in ten FESS and evaluated using the ICCAS Human-Machine Evaluation Scale. For realization of automated endoscope guidance an engine-driven and -braked manipulator (PA10-6c, Mitsubishi, Japan) was used. The technical parameters determined were expenditure of time for the preoperative planning of workspace, surgical accuracy and precision of the intraoperative endoscope positioning, maximal forces, and time. RESULTS: Concept-conditioned instrument changes amount to an average of 41.1 and 18.9% (5.21 min) time requirement for each FESS side. Maximum forces on the mucous membrane during a conventional FESS were measured at 9.8 N (5.9-9.8). Usability of the mechanical endoscope holder was estimated in 18 of 20 cases to be inferior to the standard procedure. The time needed for segmenting the intranasal workspace was 15.2 min (10.0-23.0). The maximum deviation of the automatically driven endoscope from a planned position amounted to 0.85 mm (manually 4.64 mm). The maximum force was measured with 1.1 N in the z direction (manually 9.8 N). Automated guidance of the endoscope to an intranasal position needed 7.25 s (6.4-7.9); manually 12.64 s (5.9-43.0). CONCLUSION: Guidance of the endoscope for FESS by an automated motor-driven system is possible. The conception which is based on workflow analysis favors a system with automatic definition of the workspace and a manual movement of the endoscope. The examined system offers a potential for clinical application. Definition of the automation level and development of a man-machine interface is more important than selection or reconstruction of a special manipulator for endoscope guidance in FESS from a surgical point of view.
Guidelines for reprocessing flexible endoscopes have been published in many countries. The present survey investigated compliance with German guidelines in all hospitals and private practices in Frankfurt/Main, Germany. In 2003, all endoscopic units in Frankfurt/Main [15 hospitals and 23 private practices (10 large practices performing >1,000 endoscopies/year and 13 small practices performing <1,000 endoscopies/year)] were visited by members of the Public Health Service and assessed using a checklist based on the recommendations of the German guidelines. In 2004, a re-evaluation took place, either by analysing the written reports of the institutions or by visiting them again. Meanwhile, one hospital had closed and three small practices had ceased performing endoscopy, so the re-evaluation encompassed 14 hospitals and 20 private practices. In 2003, hospital compliance with the guidelines was satisfactory but many problems were identified in private practices. Between 2003 and 2004, great improvements were made. By the end of 2004, 90% of private practices had adequate storage facilities for reprocessed endoscopes, and were performing reprocessing of bottles and tubes for air-/water-channel flushing correctly (2003: adequate storage 52%; correct reprocessing 74%). Sterilization of endoscopic accessories was satisfactory, and routine testing of endoscopes after reprocessing was performed in all private practices at the end of 2004 (2003: sterilization of accessories 57%; microbiological control tests 56%). In 2003, although hospital compliance with the guidelines was satisfactory, mandatory improvements were required in private practices, notably in smaller units. Infection control advice and the control of public health regulations resulted in the correction of most processing faults between 2003 and 2004.
An endoscope is used in pulsed digital holography to simultaneously evaluate in-plane and out- of-plane transient and harmonic displacements on a flat metallic plate. The plate is illuminated from two different directions. The optical path for each illumination direction is matched to its corresponding reference beam, but also in such a way that each object-reference beam pair optical path is mismatched such that they are incoherent and can be stored in a single CCD frame. As is typical in these types of interferometric arrangement, two digital holograms are needed to compare two different states of the plate. Each hologram is Fourier transformed and due to the incoherence introduced, two separate spectra are readily identified, each belonging to an object-reference beam pair. On comparing by subtraction the phase obtained from the two pulsed digital holograms, it is possible to gather quantitative in-plane and out-of- plane results from transient and harmonic displacements.