PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16237657

Bootstrap analysis of multivariate failure time data.

Abstract

Multivariate failure time data often arise in research. Cox proportional hazards modelling is a widely used method of analysing failure time data for independent observations. However, when failure times are correlated the Cox proportional hazards model does not yield valid estimates of standard errors or significance tests. Many methods for the analysis of multivariate failure time data have been proposed. These methods commonly test hypotheses about the regression parameters, a practice which averages the treatment effect across time. The purpose of this paper is to examine the bootstrap method for obtaining standard errors in the multivariate failure time case, particularly when the focus is the survival probability or the treatment effect at a single time point such as in a surgical trial. Our motivating example comes from the Asymptomatic Carotid and Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) in which the outcome of stroke or perioperative complications could be observed for either or both carotid arteries within each patient. Extensive simulation studies were conducted to examine the bootstrap procedure for analysing correlated failure time data under a variety of conditions including a range of treatment effects, cluster sizes, intercluster correlation values and for both proportional and non-proportional data. We found that the bootstrap method was able to estimate the standard error adequately for survival probabilities at a specific time and the standard error for the survival difference and the relative risk at a specific time. We illustrated the bootstrap method for calculating the standard error for the survival probability and statistical testing at a specific time value by analysing the two arteries per patient from the ACAS study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jane Monaco, Jianwen Cai, James Grizzle. 2005-11-30. Bootstrap analysis of multivariate failure time data.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2205

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models.

Standard survival data measure the time span from some time origin until the occurrence of one type of event. If several types of events occur, a model describing progression to each of these competing risks is needed. Multi-state models generalize competing risks models by also describing transitions to intermediate events. Methods to analyze such models have been developed over the last two decades. Fortunately, most of the analyzes can be performed within the standard statistical packages, but may require some extra effort with respect to data preparation and programming. This tutorial aims to review statistical methods for the analysis of competing risks and multi-state models. Although some conceptual issues are covered, the emphasis is on practical issues like data preparation, estimation of the effect of covariates, and estimation of cumulative incidence functions and state and transition probabilities. Examples of analysis with standard software are shown.

Biometry↗

The role of education in biostatistical consulting.

Medical students, residents, postdoctoral fellows, and faculty commonly consult with biostatistical experts about study design and data analysis when conducting clinical research. The role of biostatistical training during these consultations is examined, and characterizations of the connections between biostatistical consultation and education are reviewed. The presence and kinds of teaching efforts during biostatistical consults at four academic research institutions over various periods of time between 1999 and 2005 (237 consultations in total) were recorded and are described. By site, 67, 70, 78, and 100 per cent of the consulting sessions included biostatistical training, with an overall 78 per cent (95 per cent CI: 73-83 per cent) of consultations including an educational component when all consultations were combined. Training covered a wide range of biostatistical topics. Seventy-five per cent of the consultations with faculty (120/161), 79 per cent with fellows and residents (31/39), and 100 per cent with medical students (10/10) included some degree of instruction in study design or statistical analysis topics. Results show that both the need and the opportunity exist for specialized biostatistical instruction during one-on-one sessions between a consulting biostatistician and physicians, medical students, and research staff. Academic researchers are ideally positioned to absorb this kind of training when they initiate a request for assistance with their own research project.

Biometry↗

Improving the quality of patient care using reliability measures: a classification tree approach.

This paper considers the application and interpretation of new reliability measures for a classification tree-based medical risk assessment tool. Following the construction of a classification tree reliability measures may then be used to provide an estimate of the precision of the classification and the probability in each terminal node of the classification tree. Identification of unreliable nodes (those that have low precision) in this application may indicate patient groups requiring closer monitoring or scenarios in which further information about the patient is required, thereby providing medical practitioners with an avenue for more informed decision making.

Biometry↗