PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16272838

[Electrical defibrillation and cardioversion].

Abstract

Defibrillation and cardioversion are techniques in which a short electric impulse is administered to the heart in order to restore its normal rhythm. During cardioversion electric impulse is synchronized to the QRS on electrocardiogram. During defibrillation electric current passes through the heart in any phase of electric heart cycle. This mode of treatment is rather new - Lown et al. started to use it in a clinical practice in 1962. During defibrillation or cardioversion electric current goes from negative to positive electrode of defibrillator and passes the heart on its way. This induces transmembrane potential in myocardium cells and results in synchronic depolarization of all myocardium. The pathophysiology of defibrillation is explained by critical mass hypothesis as well as the upper limit of vulnerability hypothesis. The success of defibrillation depends on many factors, such as the location and size of electrodes, the type of defibrillator, the morphology of electric impulse, transthoracic impedance, the type and duration of arrhythmia. This procedure can be performed only on unconscious patient. The possible complications of the procedure can be disturbances in heart rhythm and conduction, the changes in arterial blood pressure, the damage to the myocardium, embolia, pulmonary edema and others. This article describes the mechanism of action of defibrillation and cardioversion, indications for this procedure, the technique and methods of defibrillation and cardioversion, the factors, responsible for the efficacy of the procedure and possible complications of defibrillation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Julija Brazdzionyte, Giedre Stanaitiene, Rūta Ablonskyte-Dūdoniene. 2005. [Electrical defibrillation and cardioversion].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16272838/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cascade training.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Defibrillators↗

Recalls and safety alerts affecting automated external defibrillators.

CONTEXT: Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) play a key role in the community resuscitation of persons with cardiac arrest and are of proven clinical benefit. Although AEDs are complex medical devices designed to function during life-threatening emergencies, little is known about their reliability. OBJECTIVES: To determine the number and rate of AED recalls and safety alerts, to identify trends in these rates, and to identify the types of malfunctions prompting AED and AED accessory advisories. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of weekly US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Enforcement Reports between January 1996 and December 2005 was performed to identify all recalls and safety alerts (collectively referred to as "advisories") involving AEDs and AED accessories. Confirmed AED device malfunctions were identified by reviewing AED-related adverse events reported to the FDA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of AEDs and AED accessories subject to FDA recall or safety alert between January 1996 and December 2005; annual AED advisory rates; and number of confirmed fatal AED-related device malfunctions reported to the FDA. RESULTS: During 2.78 million AED device-years of observation, 52 advisories (median [25th and 75th percentiles], 4.5 [3.0 and 5.0] per year) affecting 385,922 AEDs and AED accessories were issued. The mean (SE) annual number of AEDs affected by advisories was 5.1 (1.5) devices per 100 AED device-years. Overall, 21.2% of AEDs distributed during the study period were recalled, most often because of electrical or software problems. The AED advisory rate did not significantly increase during the study period, although the annual number of AED advisories (P for trend =.02) and AED advisory devices (P for trend = .01) did increase. Confirmed fatal AED-related device malfunctions occurred in 370 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Automated external defibrillators and AED accessory advisories occur frequently and affect many devices. Actual AED malfunctions do occur occasionally, although the number of observed malfunctions is small compared with the number of lives saved by these important devices. As the prevalence of AEDs continues to increase, the number of devices affected by advisories can also be expected to increase. Efforts should be directed at developing a reliable system to locate and repair potentially defective devices in a timely fashion.

Defibrillators↗