PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16276384

[Diagnosis versus code].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a result of information about coding practice in a regional hospital, the Norwegian Board of Health carried out a special supervision of ear, nose and throat (ENT) departments and neurological departments during the autumn of 2003 and the spring of 2004. The aim was to investigate whether there was accordance between information in the patient records and the chosen diagnoses and codes. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Three hospitals were examined. Information in 100 selected patient records from each department was compared with diagnoses and codes. The codes reported to the Norwegian Patient Register (NPR) from two hospitals were compared with codes in the patient records. RESULTS: Incorrect diagnoses had been systematically recorded in one ENT department. Incorrect codes had been recorded in all the departments, especially the neurological departments. Many inconsistencies between codes in the patient records and those reported to NPR were found. INTERPRETATION: Wrong diagnoses were seldom made, but many diagnoses were unprecise because only ICD-10 diagnoses were used. The rules of coding hospital stays were frequently not used. Many of the codes reported to NPR had been altered, without medical basis and without being noted in the patients' records.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Grethe Hellstrøm Hoddevik. 2005-11-03. [Diagnosis versus code].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16276384/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medicare program; prospective payment system for long-term care hospitals RY 2007: annual payment rate updates, policy changes, and clarification. Final rule.

This final rule updates the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs). The payment amounts and factors used to determine the updated Federal rates that are described in this final rule have been determined for the LTCH PPS rate year July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007. The annual update of the long-term care diagnosis-related group (LTC-DRG) classifications and relative weights remains linked to the annual adjustments of the acute care hospital inpatient diagnosis-related group system, and will continue to be effective each October 1. The outlier threshold for July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007, is also derived from the LTCH PPS rate year calculations. We are also finalizing policy changes and making clarifications.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗

The effect of misclassification errors on case mix measurement.

Case mix systems have been implemented for hospital reimbursement and performance measurement across Europe and North America. Case mix categorizes patients into discrete groups based on clinical information obtained from patient charts in an attempt to identify clinical or cost difference amongst these groups. The diagnosis related group (DRG) case mix system is the most common methodology, with variants adopted in many countries. External validation studies of coding quality have confirmed that widespread variability exists between originally recorded diagnoses and re-abstracted clinical information. DRG assignment errors in hospitals that share patient level cost data for the purpose of establishing cost weights affects cost weight accuracy. The purpose of this study is to estimate bias in cost weights due to measurement error of reported clinical information. DRG assignment error rates are simulated based on recent clinical re-abstraction study results. Our simulation study estimates that 47% of cost weights representing the least severe cases are over weight by 10%, while 32% of cost weights representing the most severe cases are under weight by 10%. Applying the simulated weights to a cross-section of hospitals, we find that teaching hospitals tend to be under weight. Since inaccurate cost weights challenges the ability of case mix systems to accurately reflect patient mix and may lead to potential distortions in hospital funding, bias in hospital case mix measurement highlights the role clinical data quality plays in hospital funding in countries that use DRG-type case mix systems. Quality of clinical information should be carefully considered from hospitals that contribute financial data for establishing cost weights.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗