PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16295340

Interprofessional practice: learning how to collaborate.

Abstract

Interprofessional practice is a way of practicing that is based on collaboration. We cannot assume that health professionals have either the skills or attributes required for interprofessional practice. They may need to learn how to collaborate. Developing interprofessional practice requires a commitment to engage in shared learning and dialogue. Dialogue has the potential to encourage collegial learning, change thinking, support new working relationships, and improve client care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Antoinette McCallin. 2005. Interprofessional practice: learning how to collaborate.. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.20.1.28

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Individual or population approaches to the promotion of physical activity...is that the question?

A recent editorial raised several issues about the role of exercise physiologists in the fight against physical inactivity in Australia. This opinion piece argues that we must strive to work together in multidisciplinary groups to improve our understanding of the mechanisms which link PA and health and the ways to persuade people to become more active. Prescription of specific exercise programs supported by exercise physiologists is one strategy for helping to activate Australians, but it is unlikely that that this alone will have a significant impact on population health. If we are to activate the 10,000,000 Australians who are currently insufficiently active for health benefit, we will need the combined efforts of governments, NGOs, teachers, planners, marketing experts, veterinarians, and ALL our health professionals, to combine forces to activate Australia.

Allied Health Occupations↗

Current provision of rheumatology education for undergraduate nursing, occupational therapy and physiotherapy students in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatological conditions are common and all health professionals (HPs) therefore need sufficient knowledge and skills to manage patients safely and effectively. The aim of this study was to examine current undergraduate education in rheumatology for HPs in the UK. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to curriculum organizers and clinical placement officers for all undergraduate courses in adult nursing, occupational therapy (OT) and physiotherapy (PT) in the UK to ascertain the nature and amount of rheumatology theory and clinical exposure provided. RESULTS: Of the 47 adult nursing, 26 OT and 30 PT undergraduate courses surveyed, 85-90% responded. Overall, rheumatology teaching is 5-10 h over 3 yr. Nursing students receive moderate/in-depth teaching on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in only 52% of courses (OT 91%, PT 96%) and on osteoarthritis (OA) in 63% (OT 91%, PT 92%). Clinical experience of RA is probably/definitely available in only 56% of nursing courses (OT 72%, PT 88%), with similar results in OA. Overall, nursing students receive the least rheumatology exposure, particularly in psychosocial issues and symptom management, while PT students receive the most. OT students have limited opportunities for clinical exposure to psychosocial and joint protection issues. Use of local rheumatology clinical HP experts is variable (18-93%) and cross-disciplinary exposure is limited (0-36%). Many educators consider their rheumatology training to be insufficient (nursing 50%, PT 42%, OT 24%). CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatology training for undergraduate HPs is limited in key areas and often fails to take advantage of local clinical expertise, with nursing students particularly restricted. Clinical HP experts should consider novel methods of addressing these shortfalls within the limited curriculum time available.

Allied Health Occupations↗

[Radiation dose of the radiologist and the assistant in transarterial hepatic chemoembolization--comparison with the dose limits].

PURPOSE: To determine the values of effective dose and partial body dose for the radiologist and the assistant during transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) und to compare the doses with the dose limits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 65 TACE of HCC cases, values of various surface doses for the radiologist and the assistant were measured. The measurements were performed with the help of thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLD) that were attached to the eyebrows, over the lobes of the thyroid gland, to the breasts, abdomen and symphysis, and to the hands and the lower legs. The measured surface dose values were used as indicators of the exposure of the organs and tissues located near the surface, i. e. eye lens, thyroid gland, breast, testes and tibia. They were also seen as conservative estimations of tissues deep inside the body and the extremities. RESULTS: The highest surface dose for the radiologist was measured at the lower leg (0.58 +/- 0.28 mSv) and the highest surface dose for the assistant was measured at the right lower leg (0.24 +/- 0.20 mSv) since it was closer to the tube than the left side, followed by the dose values at the also unprotected areas of the eyebrows, lobes of the thyroid gland and the hands. The estimated value of the effective dose was 0.06 +/- 0.03 mSv for the radiologist and 0.04 +/- 0.01 mSv for the assistant. With regard to the relationship between the dose limits according to the German X-ray regulation and the measured values and with regard to the maximum possible number of interventions per year, the partial body dose of the red bone marrow in the lower leg provided the greatest limitation, followed by the partial body dose of the muscle in the lower leg and the effective dose. CONCLUSION: In order to meet the dose limits, especially the lower leg should be protected, and the effective dose should also be reduced.

Allied Health Occupations↗