PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16311231

Developing research competence to support evidence-based practice.

Lora E Burke·Elizabeth A Schlenk·Susan M Sereika·Susan M Cohen·Mary Beth Happ·Janice S Dorman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This article describes one step in the process that was undertaken to prepare for the introduction of evidence-based practice (EBP) into the curriculum across the Bachelor of Science in Nursing, Master of Science in Nursing, and Doctor of Philosophy programs, as well as the programs that were under development, Clinical Nurse Leader and Doctor of Nursing Practice, at the University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing. Expected research competencies were identified for each level or academic year within each program. Based on these competencies, recommendations on how to modify the curriculum into one that would support students' acquisition and development of the skills necessary to be successful in matriculating through an EBP curriculum were developed. Evaluation mechanisms for the achievement of these competencies vary across the academic programs and will include performance on capstone projects, comprehensive examinations, and program milestones for doctoral students. The establishment of evidence-based competencies provided a foundation for the development of new teaching approaches and the curricular revisions across the three academic programs. Thus, the University of Pittsburgh model of educating for EBP is based on a sequential layering of research competencies throughout the curriculum.

Explore related subjects

Competency-Based EducationCurriculumEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateEducation, Nursing, GraduateEvidence-Based MedicineFaculty, NursingHumansModels, EducationalModels, NursingNeeds AssessmentNurse's RoleNursing ResearchOrganizational InnovationOrganizational ObjectivesPennsylvaniaPhilosophy, NursingProfessional CompetenceProgram DevelopmentJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lora E Burke, Elizabeth A Schlenk, Susan M Sereika, Susan M Cohen, Mary Beth Happ, Janice S Dorman. Developing research competence to support evidence-based practice.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.011

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Development and implementation of new educational concepts in a dental curriculum.

The Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam introduced a fully renewed 5-year dental curriculum in September 2003. In this article, the educational principles and didactic choices that form the basis of the curriculum development are presented and attention is given to the process of development and the implementation strategy that constitute such an important part of the success of introducing a new curriculum. Special characteristics of the new curriculum are the clinical training practice, professional conduct, the elective profiles and academic education. In clinical practice, groups of students from different levels run a group practice in which they learn to work together, delegate tasks, solve clinical problems and apply evidence-based dentistry. In the new curriculum students learn to conduct themselves as professionals. In the third and in the fifth year, students choose an elective profile oriented, respectively, on research and on clinical knowledge and skills. Academic education is an important spearhead in this curriculum in which students not only learn why research is important to dentistry but also how dentists can use research to their own benefit. In development and implementation, a stepwise approach was used in which as many people as logistically possible were involved.

Competency-Based Education↗
PubMed2006

A hierarchy of effective teaching and learning to acquire competence in evidenced-based medicine.

BACKGROUND: A variety of methods exists for teaching and learning evidence-based medicine (EBM). However, there is much debate about the effectiveness of various EBM teaching and learning activities, resulting in a lack of consensus as to what methods constitute the best educational practice. There is a need for a clear hierarchy of educational activities to effectively impart and acquire competence in EBM skills. This paper develops such a hierarchy based on current empirical and theoretical evidence. DISCUSSION: EBM requires that health care decisions be based on the best available valid and relevant evidence. To achieve this, teachers delivering EBM curricula need to inculcate amongst learners the skills to gain, assess, apply, integrate and communicate new knowledge in clinical decision-making. Empirical and theoretical evidence suggests that there is a hierarchy of teaching and learning activities in terms of their educational effectiveness: Level 1, interactive and clinically integrated activities; Level 2(a), interactive but classroom based activities; Level 2(b), didactic but clinically integrated activities; and Level 3, didactic, classroom or standalone teaching. SUMMARY: All health care professionals need to understand and implement the principles of EBM to improve care of their patients. Interactive and clinically integrated teaching and learning activities provide the basis for the best educational practice in this field.

Competency-Based Education↗