PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16315584

[Comparative analysis of methods evaluating ergonomic risks].

Abstract

The authors demonstrated appropriateness of some subjective methods evaluating strain in workers engaged into road building and determined work hardiness categories, considering peculiarities of individual methods. Calculations using empiric equations covered energy consumption during workers' dynamic activities. Empiric equations were proved to point to higher energy consumption, if compared to results of experimental methods. Objective evaluation of work hardiness involved heart rhythm monitoring through a device transforming heart rate into metabolic energy, kcal/min.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zh Roia, M Eglite, V Kal'kis, Kh Kal'kis. 2005. [Comparative analysis of methods evaluating ergonomic risks].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16315584/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A consensus guide to preclinical indirect calorimetry experiments.

Understanding the complex factors influencing mammalian metabolism and body weight homeostasis is a long-standing challenge requiring knowledge of energy intake, absorption and expenditure. Using measurements of respiratory gas exchange, indirect calorimetry can provide non-invasive estimates of whole-body energy expenditure. However, inconsistent measurement units and flawed data normalization methods have slowed progress in this field. This guide aims to establish consensus standards to unify indirect calorimetry experiments and their analysis for more consistent, meaningful and reproducible results. By establishing community-driven standards, we hope to facilitate data comparison across research datasets. This advance will allow the creation of an in-depth, machine-readable data repository built on shared standards. This overdue initiative stands to markedly improve the accuracy and depth of efforts to interrogate mammalian metabolism. Data sharing according to established best practices will also accelerate the translation of basic findings into clinical applications for metabolic diseases afflicting global populations.

Calorimetry, Indirect↗

Indirect calorimetry: relevance to patient outcome.

Indirect calorimetry provides an important adjunctive monitor for the provision of nutrition support in the critically ill patient. Accuracy in determining caloric requirements may serve to optimize benefit from nutrition therapy and improve patient outcome. A number of strategies in nutrition management in the intensive care setting (eg, dosing of enteral nutrition, monitoring cumulative caloric balance, and deliberate but "permissive" underfeeding) necessitate the determination of a fairly specific goal for caloric provision. Inaccuracy leading to inappropriate under- or overfeeding may generate additional morbidity and adverse clinical consequences for patients already at high risk from hypermetabolic stress response to injury.

Calorimetry, Indirect↗

Indirect calorimetry: methodology, instruments and clinical application.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to identify the basic methods for accurately measuring a patient's energy expenditure in clinical nutrition practice by indirect calorimetry, and the impact upon a disease state of applying the results obtained. RECENT FINDINGS: The open-circuit method is the most widely used in the majority of classical instruments for measuring energy consumption. Advances in gas exchange measurement have made this technique readily and precisely available at the bedside. Nevertheless, it is important to understand its intricate primary methodology for safe and correct application. The stress and activity factors should be carefully and specifically applied, and the respiratory quotient abandoned, for tailoring a patient's daily nutrition regimens. Caloric expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry coupled with the doubly labeled water technique introduced the concept of physical activity energy expenditure, which added to resting energy expenditure results in total daily energy expenditure. Compact modular and handheld devices have been introduced into the market, together with similar technology for evaluating exercise energy expenditure, making utilization easier, safer and precise. In the critically ill population, which is exposed to medical and surgical interventions, indirect calorimetry has greatly changed the practice of caloric administration, significantly reducing the total daily amount. SUMMARY: In conclusion, one has to be careful when choosing devices, and understanding and clinically applying the results obtained by indirect calorimetry, bearing in mind that measured resting energy expenditure should be the daily caloric goal in order to diminish clinical morbidity.

Calorimetry, Indirect↗