PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16410506

Continuing progress in neuroinformatics.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael S Gazzaniga, John D Van Horn, Floyd Bloom, Gordon M Shepherd, Marcus Raichle, Edward Jones. 2006-01-13. Continuing progress in neuroinformatics.. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.311.5758.176a

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Toward a veterinary informatics research agenda: an analysis of the PubMed-indexed literature.

PURPOSE: Veterinary medicine and human health are inextricably intertwined. Effective tracking of veterinary information - veterinary informatics - impacts not only veterinary medicine, but also public health, informatics research, and clinical care. However, veterinary informatics has received little attention from the general biomedical informatics community. METHODS: To identify both active and under-researched areas in veterinary informatics, we retrieved Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) descriptors for veterinary informatics-related citations and analyzed them by topic category, animal type, and journal. RESULTS: We found that the categories of veterinary informatics with the most growth were information/bibliographical retrieval, hardware/programming, and radiology/imaging. Less than two articles per year were published in the areas of computerized veterinary medical records, clinical decision support, standards, and controlled vocabularies. Veterinary informatics articles primarily address production animals such as cattle and sheep, and companion animals such as cats and dogs. Six journals account for 31% of the veterinary informatics literature, 35 journals account for 66%. CONCLUSIONS: Veterinary informatics remains an embryonic field with relatively few publications. With the exception of radiology/imaging, published articles are primarily focused on non-clinical areas such as hardware/programming and information retrieval. There are very few publications on controlled vocabularies, standards, methodologies for integrating disparate systems, computerized medical records, clinical decision support systems, and system usability. The lack of publications in these areas may hamper efforts to collect and track animal health data at a time when such data are potentially critical to human health.

Medical Informatics↗

Quality assurance of medical ontologies.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature concerning the quality assurance of medical ontologies. METHODS: scholar.google.com was searched using the search strings (+ontology +"quality assurance") and (+ontology +"evaluation/evaluating"). Relevant publications were selected by manual review. Other work already familiar to the author, or suggested by other researchers contacted by the author, were included. The papers were analysed for common themes. RESULTS: Four broad properties of an ontology were identified that may be quality-assured: philosophical validity, compliance with meta-ontological commitments, 'content correctness', and fitness for purpose. Each published methodology addressed only a subset of these properties. 'Content' may be divided into domain knowledge content, and metadata describing either the provenance of domain knowledge content, or relationships between it and lexical information (e.g. for display and retrieval). 'Correctness' (whether of domain knowledge content or metadata) may also be further subdivided into truth, completeness, parsimony and internal consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding of how to assure the quality of ontologies, or evaluate their fitness for specific purposes, is improving but remains poor. A combination of methodologies is required, but tools to support a comprehensive quality assurance programme remain lacking. Perfect quality of an ontology is not provable and may not be desirable: an ontology compliant with all current philosophical theories, following necessary ontological commitments, and with entirely 'correct' content, may be too complex to be directly usable or useful. The extent to which an ontology's fitness for purpose is predicted or influenced by its other properties remains to be determined. Field studies of ontologies in use, including interrater effects, are required.

Medical Informatics↗