PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 16469350

Flash lag in depth.

Abstract

The perceived position of a moving target at a particular point in time, indicated by a flash, is often judged to be different from its actual location. Here, we show that the position of a target moving in depth is also systematically mislocalized. We used three types of targets moving in depth at a range of speeds from 2 to 16 cm/s. (i) A target realistically rendered that included concordant looming, disparity, and perspective cues. (ii) A random dot surface whose depth was defined by disparity, without concordant perspective or looming cues. (iii) A surface of dynamic random dots whose depth was defined by disparity with no consistent motion visible monocularly. Subjects viewed the targets moving either towards or away from them and indicated whether the targets appeared to be nearer or farther than a continuously present reference depth at the moment that a flash was presented. A staircase procedure was used to null, and thus measure, any perceptual displacement from the reference depth. A flash lag in depth was found in which the target appeared ahead of its true position, displaced by a constant amount of time depending on the stimulus type and the direction of motion (towards or away). The time displacement varied from 76 ms (for the realistic target moving away from the observer) to 263 ms (for static random dots moving towards). These effects may depend on the confidence with which subjects were able to judge the location of our various targets: greater confidence leading to a smaller temporal displacement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Laurence R Harris, Philip A Duke, Agnieszka Kopinska. 2006-02-15. Flash lag in depth.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.

In a recall-based spoken production experiment, native English-speaking participants' variable use of the complementiser that to introduce the sentential complement in sentences like Henry knew (that) Lucy/Louise washed the dishes was found to be related to whether that inclusion/omission resulted in an alternating sequence of stressed and unstressed syllables between the verb of the main clause and the subject of the complement clause. This finding is discussed in relation to the question of whether and how phonological encoding can influence grammatical encoding in spoken language production.

Cues↗

Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.

Repeated statements receive higher truth ratings than new statements. Given that repetition leads to greater experienced processing fluency, the author proposes that fluency is used in truth judgments according to its ecological validity. Thus, the truth effect occurs because people learn that fluency and truth tend to be positively correlated. Three experiments tested this notion. Experiment 1 replicated the truth effect by directly manipulating processing fluency; Experiment 2 reversed the effect by manipulating the correlation between fluency and truth in a learning phase. Experiment 3 generalized this reversal by showing a transfer of a negative correlation between perceptual fluency (due to color contrast) and truth to truth judgments when fluency is due to prior exposure (i.e., repetition).

Cues↗